Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Wentworth Institute of Technology/BIOL1100 (Spring 2017)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- BIOL1100
- Institution
- Wentworth Institute of Technology
- Instructor
- Ryan Rogers
- Wikipedia Expert
- Ian (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Biology
- Course dates
- 2017-01-09 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-04-11 23:59:59 UTC
- Approximate number of student editors
- 17
This course introduces basic principles of cellular and molecular biology. Topics include: properties of life, organic molecules, general features of cells, membrane structure, synthesis and transport, introduction to energy, enzymes and metabolism, cell respiration, photosynthesis, cell communication, tissues, nucleic acid structure, DNA replication and chromosome structure, gene expression and regulation, mutation, the eukaryotic cell cycle, mitosis and meiosis.
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 27 February 2017 | Wednesday, 1 March 2017 | Thursday, 2 March 2017
- Milestones
Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course.
Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.
To get started, please review the following handouts:
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 6 March 2017 | Wednesday, 8 March 2017 | Thursday, 9 March 2017
- Assignment - Create your account & take introductory trainings
- Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
- It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
- When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 20 March 2017 | Wednesday, 22 March 2017 | Thursday, 23 March 2017
- Assignment - Select & critique an article
Evaluating resources is an important skill for discerning the quality of a specific reference for citation. Since we use Wikipedia as a starting point and not a direct reference, it is essential to check the credibility and depth of these articles before trusting the content. During this phase of the project, you have the opportunity to evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improvement on their article Talk pages. In addition to the online component, you will be submitting a hard-copy critique in class on March 24, 2017 using the detailed guidelines below.
Instructions:
- Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
- Select and assign yourself an article from the Articles tab to critique. Be sure no one else has taken the topic.
- You may also select your own article; however, be sure to submit the article via email to Dr. Rogers for approval before proceeding.
- If you are having difficulty selecting your article, consider browsing one of the following categories on Wikipedia first
- While you read the articles, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Is the article locked? What does this mean for the information held within the article? Why do you think it might be locked or protected?
- Check the Talk page of the article. What kinds of discussions is the Wikipedia community having about how to represent this topic? What is the article rated on Wikipedia's quality scale?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic compare to how we've discussed it in class?
- Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Melanie azeredo (talk) 01:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC).
- Answer all questions listed above in a formal critique for in-class submission on 3/27/16 to be graded.
Week 4
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 27 March 2017 | Wednesday, 29 March 2017 | Thursday, 30 March 2017
- Assignment - Make it better and add on
Now that you have critiqued the article you have the opportunity to apply the suggestions and improve the content! Be sure that you understand plagiarism and appropriate citation techniques as your edits may become public. Additionally, your edits may be deleted by other editors later one--but that is totally acceptable.
- Complete the "Plagiarism" and "Sources & Citations" Trainings (linked below).
- Think about what you learned during the article evaluation assignment. What small change could you make to your article to improve it?
- Using the same article from your critique, add 2-5 new sentences supported with at least 2 citations to improve the content.
- Submit a hard-copy of your improvement sentences/paragraph with the appropriate references and citation included.
Week 5
- Course meetings
-
- Thursday, 6 April 2017
- In class - Mini-Symposium Day
You have thoroughly researched a topic and enhanced the availability of information, now you have the opportunity to present in front of your colleagues. On April 6 you will have a 10 minute block during the lab to present your topic using a visual aide.
- Rubrics containing specific presentation guidelines will be distributed as the date approaches.
- Colleagues will be expected to evaluate the presentation in the form of peer-review.