Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Guelph/Pet Nutrition (Fall 2016)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Pet Nutrition
- Institution
- University of Guelph
- Instructor
- Nicole Weidner
- Wikipedia Expert
- Ian (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Pet Nutrition
- Course dates
- 2016-09-08 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-01-14 23:59:59 UTC
- Approximate number of student editors
A course in which students will learn about nutrient requirements and nutritional idiosyncrasies of dogs, cats, pocket and exotic pets, formulation and manufacturing of pet food, and be introduced to the principles of fundamental nutrition of pets and important health and well being aspects that are related to nutrition and/or treated through nutritional approaches.
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 13 September 2016 | Thursday, 15 September 2016
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 20 September 2016 | Thursday, 22 September 2016
- Assignment - Wikipedia Training
Complete basic Wikipedia training. (5%)
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 27 September 2016 | Thursday, 29 September 2016
- Assignment - Critique the article "Filler (animal food)"
It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.
- Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
- Critique the article titled "Filler (animal food)". Consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC).
- In class - Discussion
- Thinking about sources and plagiarism
- Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
- What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
- What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
- What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
Week 4
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 4 October 2016 | Thursday, 6 October 2016
Week 5
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 11 October 2016 | Thursday, 13 October 2016
Week 6
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 18 October 2016 | Thursday, 20 October 2016
- Assignment - Find your sources
- In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to your group's article.
- Think back to when you did an article critique. What were some of the missing elements in that article? How can you ensure your group's article is high-quality? Post some of your ideas in your sandbox.
- Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
- Draft your article
You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.
Creating a new article?
- Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
- A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.
Improving an existing article?
- Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.
Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.
Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9
- Milestones
Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.
Week 7
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 25 October 2016 | Thursday, 27 October 2016
Week 8
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 1 November 2016 | Thursday, 3 November 2016
- Assignment - Expand your draft
- Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
- If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Week 9
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 8 November 2016 | Thursday, 10 November 2016
Week 10
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 15 November 2016 | Thursday, 17 November 2016
- Assignment - Peer review
- Group peer review is worth 15% of assignment mark.
- First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
- Select a classmates’ article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review, and then assign it to yourself in the Review column.
- Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
- As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
- Milestones
Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.
- In class - Respond to your peer review
You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!
- Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
- Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.
Week 11
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 22 November 2016 | Thursday, 24 November 2016
- Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia
Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."
Editing an existing article?
- NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
- Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
Creating a new article?
- Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
- You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.
- Assignment - Continue improving your article
Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.
- Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
Week 12
- Course meetings
-
- Tuesday, 29 November 2016 | Thursday, 1 December 2016
- Milestones
Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.
- Assignment - Final article
It's the final week to develop your article.
- Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
- Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!
- Assignment - Grade your team members on their involvement
Grade from your team members for involvement is worth 10% of the assignment mark.