Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/SUNY Plattsburgh/Cell Biology with Lab, Bio 401 (Fall 2015)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Cell Biology with Lab, Bio 401
Institution
SUNY Plattsburgh
Instructor
Jparcoeur
Subject
Cell Biology
Course dates
2015-08-24 – 2015-12-18
Approximate number of student editors
28


Student Assigned Reviewing
Jparcoeur
FCapobianco
Akunz001
Tlawt001 Hürthle_cell_adenoma
Ancharles002 Cytoskeleton
Mostafathi1
Carolinejoyce99 Bacteriocyte Cytology
Doglover93
Thill004 Tonofibril
Mcham005 Cementoblast
Lharrison187
Melissavulaj
KaylaQ 10
Darguerrier Foreign-body_giant_cell
Merongirma20 Tonofibril Tonofibril
Lucas14RG
Mmcerveira Adaptive_response Adaptive_response
DavidpBowman Unicellular_organism Unicellular_organism
BMust34 Ectoplasmic_specialisation
Cfern004
Jsell002 Cisterna Somatic_Cells
Mostafa Elbery
Chemfreak94
Rrock401
Drowe002
Tglm002 Flavin_mononucleotide Telophase
Awhit029
SBlai005 Cell_Biology Caspase_Activity
Sdoug006

Timeline

Week 1: Wikipedia introduction

In class - Wikipedia essentials
  • Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
  • Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss expectations and etiquette.



Handout: Editing Wikipedia


Assignment - Create your account and learn the basics
  • Create an account and then complete the online training for students. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.



Resources: Online Training for Students

Week 2: What makes a good Wikipedia article

Assignment - Critique an article
  • Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.
  • Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article related to cell biology, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's talk page.
  • A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
  • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
  • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
  • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
  • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
  • == I will check the talk pages and grade you according to how much you helped the page and people who might be working on them == Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia, Using Talk Pages

Week 3: Work on critique

Milestones

Week 4: Contribute to an article

Assignment - Contribute to an article
  • Add 3 sentences minimum of new information to a Wikipedia article related to the class (try "https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Cell_biology_stubs%22 for ideas). They must be backed up with a 2 citations minimum to the best (most recent and relevant) peer reviewed scientific journal sources.
  • You will work with your assigned group (proof reader, fact checker, and computer/wikipedia tech wizard).
  • Each of you must do your own article for your own separate grade.
  • You must run your article past your group's fact checker and proof reader, and the tech person must be available for technical problems.
  • You must fulfill your group role or points will be deducted (your group will be surveyed).
  • Add 3 sentences minimum of new information to a Wikipedia article related to the class (try "https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Cell_biology_stubs%22 for ideas). They must be backed up with a 2 citations minimum to the best (most recent and relevant) peer reviewed scientific journal sources.

Week 5: work on edits

Week 6: work on edits

Week 7: Initial Post due

Assignment - Final post grade criteria

You will be graded on: Quality of the final contribution (50 points) How you responded to critiques and edits by others (10 points) Feedback on your team contribution (10 points)

Milestones

Week 8: Respond to editors and improve your post

Week 9: final post graded

Milestones