Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Northeastern University/Advanced Writing in the Sciences 2 (Fall 2024)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Advanced Writing in the Sciences 2
- Institution
- Northeastern University
- Instructor
- Galen Bunting
- Wikipedia Expert
- Ian (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Writing
- Course dates
- 2024-09-03 00:00:00 UTC – 2024-12-09 23:59:59 UTC
- Approximate number of student editors
- 19
This class is designed to help you learn to become flexible, adaptable writers in your discipline. Part of our work will be to help you develop technical expertise and common problems in technical and professional communication. Our class is a writing workshop, which means that we will write drafts, speak to one another about ideas, brainstorm, and write for multiple audiences. Together, we will work through sequential drafts of 3 main assignments, including a professional memo, a synthesis/wiki article, and a research proposal, culminating with a final presentation. We will have readings which support these genres, including examples. Since our focus will be on editing and revision, please expect to work through multiple drafts during our time together, and be prepared to give feedback to others.
Our second assignment takes the form of a synthesis or Wiki article, which takes place over six weeks and has its home on Wikipedia. Through a chosen topic, you will provide the background for further research in your future proof-of concept/proposal. For your literature review (also called a synthesis), first annotate five peer-reviewed sources in a draft, then expand those connections, synthesizing the prior research to show the research which has come before. Which trends, which central discussions or problems emerge? The purpose of a literature review is to compile your research, across a variety of sources informed by a central topic. Before you can enter a scholarly discussion, you must understand what the other sources which address your inquiry are saying. The purpose of a literature review is to put your sources in conversation with one another, and then present your own judgement of the sources and their relevance to the topic at hand. In your literature review, you should critically evaluate these works for an audience of your fellow researchers and scientists in order to provide context for the current discussion. You should provide background and issues of your proposed research question, situate yourself within your discipline, and summarize key debates and developments in the field. Avoid overly broad topics. You’ll have better luck writing about a narrowly focused (though not too narrowly focused) topic than on a broad overview. When you find 3–5 good sources that address your topic, you’re probably ready to start writing. If you can’t, reassess your selected topic.
If you choose to format your synthesis as a Wiki entry, start with a clear summary of the most important parts of the synthesis. For a short synthesis, your lead may only be a few sentences. It isn’t meant to catch the reader’s attention, or explain why the topic is important. Instead, it’s a quick summary of the article in plain language. In your body paragraphs, remember to cite sources for factual claims. One citation per factual statement is a good rule of thumb. Make sure to attribute viewpoints to the people who hold them. When stating a conclusion based on an article, make sure to attribute it to a specific source. Keep to the facts, and let your writing be clear, formal, and impersonal. You aren’t trying to convince readers to agree with you. You’ll want to make sure they trust the information you’re sharing, so that the main facts of your topic can be quickly reviewed. Think of describing your specific topic as an overview of information, based on good sources, so that when you write your proposal, you have a strong background to base your work upon.
| Student | Assigned | Reviewing |
|---|---|---|
| Sciencewriter22 | ||
| Rossvieira | ||
| Wong.lil | ||
| Lpando22 | ||
| Maddieprechtl | ||
| Emmac444 | ||
| Patricioboy | ||
| AJKeen | ||
| Lilywong1 | ||
| Wong.lil2 |