 Done Article is "B" class. Has adequate coverage of material and good background. Needs to review some repeated citations where they may be unnecessary (such as consecutive sentences using the same citation). Material in the infobox that is cited should be cited where this info is in the body rather than the infobox. ButlerBlog (talk) 00:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is "B" class. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is "B" class (left other project ratings as-is). ButlerBlog (talk) 23:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is "C" class. Needs expanded coverage to be B class. ButlerBlog (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is now "B" class. ButlerBlog (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Definitely B class. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is C class; still needs work to be B class. There are some {{cn}} tags that need to be addressed, and the lead does not appear to be uncited due to coverage in the body (i.e. then lead content not addressed later needs to be cited). Episode tables use default color. Plot summaries should be in the episode table and not stand alone (if both are used). ButlerBlog (talk) 12:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is B class. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Definitely C class. Lacks citations in a lot of areas. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Pretty close to B class. Seems to be adequately cited for the most part, but has a couple of unaddressed {{cn}} tags. Plot summary is probably considered too long. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Not quite B class. Has good content coverage and nearly meets all requirements, but comes up a little short on citations. ButlerBlog (talk) 01:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is marginally B class. Could still use a little work (some film credits are not specifically cited), but overall it's b-class. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you perhaps link to the wrong Perkins, User:Butlerblog? Anthony Perkins is currently only listed as C class, but even the quickest of peeks tells me it is easily B class - a long detailed good-looking well-sourced article on an internationally known actor from a seminal film. Perhaps even A class (but for that I would need to study the article for longer). Regards CapnZapp (talk) 07:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @CapnZapp: Thanks for looking at it. Length-wise, I agree that it's fine - it definitely covers the topic well, which is B#2 of the assessment criteria. While there's more to B-class than just length, I thought it was B-class on all of the criteria with the exception of B#1 - suitably referenced. At first glance, it would appear to be; but when you really take a good, detailed look over the article, there are some spots where entire paragraphs lack a source. Now, it might be that that information doesn't need to be cited - it could be covered and cited elsewhere in the article and is simply repeated. But I haven't look at it closely enough to determine that, which was the main reason I held back on the B-class. Also, there are a couple of places where the opposite it true - there are a couple of instances of overcite/refbombs. Those should be cleaned up, either removing sources that are repetitive, or bundling them. So, it this minor nitpicking? Yes, but the assessment criteria don't mean anything if we're lax about them. Assessment is not a perfect science, so my opinion on it is just that - my opinion. Someone (like you) else may look at it and say, "definitely B class" and that's fine by me. But part of my opinion on it is that we shouldn't be too cavalier about assessment. B-class and higher assessments should have a high bar and a good study of the article to make sure they meet the criteria well. (That said, I agree that the content is there for an even higher assessment.) Hope that gives some clarity to what my thought process was. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article was already assessed as B class. ButlerBlog (talk) 23:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Article is B class. ButlerBlog (talk) 23:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Assessed as C class. Could be B class, but a significant portion of the biographical information comes from text of an interview posted on westernclippings.com. Boyd Magers's site is considered reliable - especially since he is a cited source in several books we already consider to be reliable sources themselves. However, so much weight to one single interview by the subject of the interview doesn't provide much in the way of verifiability (other than the fact that she said it about herself). In some cases, that may be fine, and that may be the case here, but it would need a second set of eyes to confirm that. ButlerBlog (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Assessed as C class. Could be B class with some additional sourcing, and more content in production section. ButlerBlog (talk) 02:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Assessed as C-class. There are too many uncited (and tagged) items to even consider B-class until that's cleaned up. ButlerBlog (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
|
