Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Covenant Elite
Cleaning up and decrufting the page. Comments on improvement or suggestions here! David Fuchs (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Seems to have some sectioning problems. "The Elites have been featured in several action figure series." isn't "Reception". Also, "The Elites have been described as superior to human Marines as allies" isn't Reception, it's closed to "Attributes", as it's in-universe information. "they are extremely strong" and "Elites have multiple hearts and purple blood" isn't "Outward appearance".
- "[A]ble to match the strength of a Spartan-II in MJOLNIR power armor" is meaningless to the non-gamer.
- Watch for redundancies and opportunities to tighten: "The Elites are
firstintroduced as..." - '...described as a "brilliant stroke of game design"' needs a source.
Much of the development section seems to relate to the Covenant in general. Perhaps this should be merged into the Covenant article?
- How does much of the development section relate to the Covenant in general? the entire section is only discussing the development of the Elites themselves, mentions of early designs, mention of changes done to this design during the game's production, etc. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I think I was looking at the wrong article. Pagrashtak 00:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- How does much of the development section relate to the Covenant in general? the entire section is only discussing the development of the Elites themselves, mentions of early designs, mention of changes done to this design during the game's production, etc. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- It seems David took care of the sectioning problems, I will nominate the article at GAC now seeing that most of the problems seem easy to fix and we should try to get ahead of the GAC backlog. - Caribbean~H.Q. 05:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Shall I close this peer review then? Pagrashtak 20:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- It seems David took care of the sectioning problems, I will nominate the article at GAC now seeing that most of the problems seem easy to fix and we should try to get ahead of the GAC backlog. - Caribbean~H.Q. 05:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Aye. David Fuchs (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)