Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Chrono Cross

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chrono Cross[edit]

With Chrono Trigger done (thanks guys), Cross is next. References have been formatted and the article is cited to death, and unnecessary character information has been cut out. The full cited plot summary is back in to meet the comprehensiveness requirement, and the reception section has been enhanced by a few hours of digging deep through reviews. If anyone can help copyedit or provide advice for getting the prose tip top, it would be hugely appreciated. --Zeality 16:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good referencing! I like it. I'm not exactly a world-class copy-editor, so hit up Tony or Deckiller or someone who's done it a bunch if you can, but I'll look through it. --PresN 22:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that there's a bit too much plot summary before you actually get to the plot section, but that's just me. Also, 11 reference links in a row (predecessor.[6][36][7][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]) is a bit...odd. --PresN 22:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, wasn't quite sure what to do with that. Since I've revised the Cross article two months ago, there have been three (reverted) incidents in which anonymous users have added some kind of note that the game is substandard or was hugely criticized. There are people out there who think this is true, so I made sure to add a bunch of references. But my, is that a huge break in that paragraph, heh... --Zeality 23:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you can add 1-2 more paragraphs of out of universe info, the article should be ready to go. — Deckiller 02:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]