Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Assessment/Alpha Quadrant
Alpha Quadrant's PPI Assessment Page
[edit]Alpha Quadrant is classified as a Wikipedia expert.
Rubric
[edit]| Assessment area | Scoring methods | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensiveness | Score based on how fully the article covers significant aspects of the topic. | 1-10 |
| Sourcing | Score based on adequacy of inline citations and quality of sources relative to what is available. | 0-6 |
| Neutrality | Score based on adherence to the Neutral Point of View policy. Scores decline rapidly with any problems with neutrality. | 0-3 |
| Readability | Score based on how readable and well-written the article is. | 0-3 |
| Formatting | Score based on quality of the article's layout and basic adherence to the Wikipedia Manual of Style | 0-2 |
| Illustrations | Score based on how adequately the article is illustrated, within the constraints of acceptable copyright status. | 0-2 |
| Total | 1-26 |
Assessment 1, part 1
[edit]The purpose of this evaluation in not to gauge variability in article quality, but to look at the metric itself. How consistent is this assessment tool? and Is there a difference in scores between subject area expert assessment and Wikipedian article assessment?
Drug Policy of the United States (1 July 2010)
[edit]- Comprehensiveness = 4
- Sourcing = 4
- Neutrality = 3
- Readability = 2
- Illustrations = 1
- Formatting = 1
- Total = 15
Brown v. Board of Education (1 July 2010)
[edit]- Comprehensiveness = 8
- Sourcing = 6
- Neutrality = 3
- Readability = 3
- Illustrations = 2
- Formatting = 2
- Total = 24
- Comprehensiveness = 7
- Sourcing = 5
- Neutrality = 2
- Readability = 2
- Illustrations = 2
- Formatting = 2
- Total = 20
- Comprehensiveness = 9
- Sourcing = 5
- Neutrality = 3
- Readability = 3
- Illustrations = 2
- Formatting = 2
- Total = 24
- Comprehensiveness = 5
- Sourcing = 5
- Neutrality = 1
- Readability = 5
- Illustrations = 0
- Formatting = 0
- Total = 14
- Comprehensiveness = 3
- Sourcing = 4
- Neutrality = 2
- Readability = 1
- Illustrations = 0
- Formatting = 0
- Total = 10
- Comprehensiveness = 8
- Sourcing = 6
- Neutrality = 2
- Readability = 2
- Illustrations = 2
- Formatting = 2
- Total = 22
- Comprehensiveness = 6
- Sourcing = 5
- Neutrality = 1
- Readability = 1
- Illustrations = 1
- Formatting = 1
- Total = 15
Assessment 1, Part 2
[edit]Assessment request 2, please use article version from 1 October 2010. There are a couple of rereviews, hopefully those will go fast for you. This set will tie up the first assessment, which tests the quantitative metric and compares Wikipedian assessment to expert assessment.
- Comprehensiveness = 4
- Sourcing = 3
- Neutrality = 3
- Readability = 3
- Illustrations = 1
- Formatting = 1
- Total = 15
- Comprehensiveness = 2
- Sourcing = 1
- Neutrality = 2
- Readability = 1
- Illustrations = 0
- Formatting = 0
- Total = 6
- Comprehensiveness = 8
- Sourcing = 3
- Neutrality = 2
- Readability = 2
- Illustrations = 1
- Formatting = 1
- Total = 17
- Comprehensiveness = 2
- Sourcing = 2
- Neutrality = 3
- Readability = 3
- Illustrations = 0
- Formatting = 1
- Total = 11
- Comprehensiveness = 2
- Sourcing = 4
- Neutrality = 1
- Readability = 3
- Illustrations = 0
- Formatting = 1
- Total = 11
- Comprehensiveness = 6
- Sourcing = 2
- Neutrality = 2
- Readability = 1
- Illustrations = 3
- Formatting = 0
- Total = 14
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total
- Comprehensiveness
- Sourcing
- Neutrality
- Readability
- Illustrations
- Formatting
- Total