Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Three Kingdoms/Assessment

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Detail of Battle of Changban
Detail of Battle of Changban
WikiProject Three Kingdoms
Things you can do

Here are some open WikiProject Three Kingdoms tasks:

  • Meta-tasks:
    • Place the {{WP3K}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
    • Get pictures for the infoboxes of the 3K people.
    • Add references to the articles.
  • Improvement Drive
    • Segregate fact and fiction for all biography and history articles.

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Assessment for WikiProject Three Kingdoms

Article assessment

[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WP3K}} project banner on the article's talk page. Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Three Kingdoms articles.

Class

[edit]

Parameters

[edit]

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Other classes

Quality scale

[edit]
Article progress grading scheme
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
FA
{{FA-Class}} 		Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible. Battle of Red Cliffs
A
{{A-Class}} 		Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Battle of Red Cliffs
GA
{{GA-Class}} 		The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. Battle of Red Cliffs
B
{{B-Class}} 		Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Battle of Changban
Start
{{Start-Class}} 		The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Zhang Jiao, Battle of Sishui Pass
Stub
{{Stub-Class}} 		The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Wuchao
Other classes
Label Criteria Examples
List Lists List of personages of the Three Kingdoms
Disambig Disambiguation pages -
Template Templates used in Three Kingdoms articles. {{Three Kingdoms infobox}}
Redirect Redirections. Lu Bu, Liu Pei

Importance

[edit]

Parameters

[edit]

The following values may be used for the priority parameter:

  • Top
  • High
  • Mid
  • Low
  • No

Importance scale

[edit]
Article importance grading scheme
Label Criteria Examples
Top Reserved for primary articles related to Three Kingdoms. Three Kingdoms, Cao Wei, Shu Han, etc.
High Most famous and influential people, emperors, major campaigns and battles. Cao Cao, Zhuge Liang, Battle of Red Cliff
Mid Secondary people (Minor warlords, etc) and smaller battles. Significant fictitious elements goes here. Yuan Tan, Diaochan, Battle of Jieting
Low Minor Three Kingdom topics. Fictitious elements and minor officers. Battle of Hulao Pass, Ma Tie
None Articles lightly related to the Three Kingdoms era. Related videogames, anime, etc. Dynasty Warriors, Koutetsu Sangokushi

Other parameters

[edit]
Parameter Associated category Explanation Supported values
attention Category:Three Kingdoms articles needing attention Does this article need active attention (POV issues, badly organized, unreferenced)? attention=yes
The attention value should not appear in the template, if the article does not need attention.
merge Category:Three Kingdoms articles needing merge action Should we consider merging this into another article? merge=yes
The merge value should not appear in the template, if the article does not need to be merged.
needs-infobox Category:Three Kingdoms articles needing infoboxes Is it missing the Ethnic group Infobox? needs-infobox=yes
The needs-infobox value should not appear in the template, if the article does not need an infobox.
cat Category:Three Kingdoms categories Identifies categories for Three Kingdoms-related content. cat=yes
The cat parameter only to be set on category talk pages. The class parameter should also be set to NA (class=NA)

Statistics

[edit]
Three Kingdoms articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1
GA 1 1 2
B 1 43 87 85 1 217
C 7 25 39 38 1 5 115
Start 1 33 105 170 11 320
Stub 43 83 6 132
List 1 1 7 9
Disambig 6 6
Redirect 15 274 289
NA 39 39
Assessed 10 103 275 399 320 23 1,130
Total 10 103 275 399 320 23 1,130
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 3,507 Ω = 4.46


Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Three_Kingdoms/Assessment&oldid=1146631960"