Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2024/May

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Proposals, May 2024

Russia river stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Currently contains over 800 articles. If we split by region:

Siberia - 243
Southern Russia - 96
North Caucasus - 17
Russian Far East - 184

I will come back with updated number per oblast. Her Pegship (?) 23:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Well, it looks like "per oblast" isn't going to yield sufficient articles for sub-cats. I propose we create these:

{{Siberia-river-stub}} / Category:Siberia river stubs
{{South-Russia-river-stub}} / Category:Southern Russia river stubs
{{FarEast-Russia-river-stub}} / Category:Russian Far East river stubs
upmerged {{NorthCaucasus-river-stub}}

Thoughts? Her Pegship (?) 21:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Antigua and Barbuda association football stubs categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
I think that Category:Antigua and Barbuda association football stubs should be created due to the amount of footballers, football league seasons, and football managers from Antigua and Barbuda who have articles which are stubs. WIKIPEDA (yes i meant to misspell it) (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Oppose - insufficient numbers. Category:Antigua and Barbuda football biography stubs exists (73 articles); among the rest of the articles under Category:Football in Antigua and Barbuda, only 32 use a stub template other than the -bio- one. Her Pegship (?) 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
You make a good point, and this stub category is far too niche to be created. This is clearly not going to go anywhere, so i'll probably just close the debate as 'do not create', unless this gets more activity. WIKIPEDA (yes i meant to misspell it) (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Philippine church and hospital stubs categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
For better organization, I propose that Category:Philippine church stubs and Category:Philippine hospital stubs be created since several church and hospital articles are listed in Category:Philippine building and structure stubs. Sanglahi86 (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Oppose - {{Philippines-church-stub}} links to only 29 articles, and {{Philippines-hospital-stub}} links to 50 articles; as 60+ articles is the standard recommendation for a separate stub category, each of these would need to be used on more articles. (None of the other stub templates upmerged to Category:Philippine building and structure stubs are linked to sufficient numbers, either. Some re-sorting might be in order.) Her Pegship (?) 23:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.