Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2022/March
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Proposals, March 2022
Category:Ericales stubs subcategories
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Propose creating four family subcategories of Category:Ericales stubs, which already contains four other such cats:
- Category:Primulaceae stubs; 228 pages
- Category:Polemoniaceae stubs; 164 pages
- Category:Ebenaceae stubs; 83 pages
- Category:Pentaphylacaceae stubs; 79 pages.
1234 kb of .rar files (is this dangerous?) 17:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Speedy creation cats
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
I updated the uncatted stubs list and found several upmerged templates which now qualify for their own categories. I request to create the following:
- {{Estonia-river-stub}} - 76 - Category:Estonia river stubs
- {{Tamaulipas-geo-stub}} - 61 - Category:Tamaulipas geography stubs
- {{Taiwan-road-stub}} - 84 - Category:Taiwan road stubs
- {{Rivne-geo-stub}} - 60 -
Category:Rivne geography stubsCategory:Rivne Oblast geography stubs - {{Pakistan-constituency-stub}} - 184 - Category:Pakistan constituency stubs
- {{Ophidiidae-stub}} - 76 - Category:Ophidiidae stubs
- {{Naryn-geo-stub}} - 62 - Category:Naryn geography stubs
- {{Lancashire-school-stub}} - 68 - Category:Lancashire school stubs
- {{Italy-footy-midfielder-1900s-stub}} - 67 - Category:Italian football midfielder, 1900s birth stubs
- {{Defensiveback-1920s-stub}} - 61 - Category:American football defensive back, 1920s birth stubs
Her Pegship (?) 00:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Security Hacker stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was do not create.
Category:Security Hacker stubs There are no hacker stub existing still now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bijoy2020 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Apparently Bijoy2020 did not read the instructions so plainly given on the Proposals page.
- 1. We have an existing stub category, Category:Computer security stubs, which can be used until such time as a "security hacker/computer hacker" stub type is needed.
- 2. A "security hacker/computer hacker" stub type is not needed. Category:Computer criminals and its sub-categories don't have sufficient numbers to justify such a stub type.
- 3. Category:Security Hacker stubs was created by Bijoy2020 without regard to procedure, without a stub template, and under a parent cat that doesn't exist ("stub").
- I see that someone has already nominated the category for speedy deletion, for which I thank them. @@Bijoy2020: next time you want to create a stub type or category, please seek guidance from the Stub sorting Project. Thanks. Her Pegship (?) 19:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.