Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands/Assessment

Netherlands pages by quality
Quality
	Total
FA	55
FL	14
A	1
GA	178
B	904
C	3,157
Start	12,465
Stub	17,368
List	960
Category	15,488
Disambig	56
File	263
Portal	9
Project	27
Redirect	880
Template	1,268
NA	14
Assessed	53,107
Unassessed	40
Total	53,147
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 182,230			Ω = 5.34

Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor

Can I rank an article as I like?

No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?

Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Netherlands articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Netherlands articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Netherlands articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Netherlands articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Netherlands articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Netherlands articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Netherlands articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Netherlands articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Netherlands articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Netherlands articles)		Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Netherlands articles)		Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Netherlands articles)		Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Netherlands articles)		File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Netherlands articles)		Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Netherlands articles)		Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Netherlands articles)		Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Netherlands articles)		Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Netherlands articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Netherlands articles)		???

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

November 30, 2024

Renamed

• Cup with cover renamed to Grace cup.

Reassessed

• Attack on Aruba (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Bedroom in Arles (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• De Zeven Provinciën-class cruiser (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Safety Board (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Emmy Andriesse (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Henk Blezer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Rogier Wassen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Sloot Digital Coding System (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Ton Koopman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Walter Lewin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Wubbo Ockels (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Coconut cup (Hans van Amsterdam, Metropolitan Museum) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• File:Flussregenpfeifer im flachen Wasser 01.jpg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t)
• File:Grote sponszwam (Sparassis crispa). 09-11-2023. (d.j.b).jpg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Hendrikx (politician, born 1941) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Robert Jan Westdijk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• Siege of Bredevoort (1672) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ton Diepeveen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Zwaardvisch-class submarine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

November 29, 2024

Renamed

• Trust International renamed to Trust (company).

Reassessed

• Famke (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Blokhuijsen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Dalhuisen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• John Clifford Lord (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Lieke (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Mia Audina (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Michiel Schapers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Raemon Sluiter (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:20th-century Dutch sportsmen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:20th-century Dutch sportspeople (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:20th-century Dutch sportswomen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Antony Kok (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch erotica and pornography websites (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch female erotic dancers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch people of North American descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Jarich van Liauckema (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Meike (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
• Rembrandt (given name) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
• Trust (company) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

November 28, 2024

Renamed

• Jan Hendrik renamed to Jan Dalhuisen.
• Mercelina cabinet renamed to First Mercelina cabinet.

Reassessed

• 2018–19 T20 World Cup Europe Qualifier (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Bep van Ipenburg-Drommel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Ingrid van Houten-Groeneveld (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Isaac Dorislaus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Mark Neeleman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Niels Laros (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• SpangaS op Survival (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Yao Jie (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Dutch naval personnel of the Second Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch naval personnel of the Third Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• First Mercelina cabinet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Dalhuisen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• John Clifford Lord (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Julian Kwaaitaal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Lennart van Lierop (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Lorenzo Codutti (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:People of the Second Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:People of the Third Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Raf Kooremans (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Third Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

November 27, 2024

Renamed

• Jan Hendrik Dalhuisen renamed to Jan Hendrik.
• Lutgardis of Luxemburg renamed to Lutgardis of Luxembourg.

Reassessed

• 2015 Holland Ladies Tour (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• American Service-Members' Protection Act (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Franco-Dutch War (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacco Arends (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Kamp Amersfoort National Monument (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Lotte Jonathans (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Daan Steur (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Daphna Awadish (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Hendrik (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Kayne van Oevelen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Lutgardis of Luxembourg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Maas International (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Milan Hokke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Milan de Haan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Stije Resink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Tika de Jonge (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Tjeerd van Andel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Wouter Prins (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

November 26, 2024

Reassessed

• 2011 European T20 Championship Division Two (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Andre Mannaart (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Aneta (news agency) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Australia-Netherlands relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Belgium-Netherlands relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Bofors 15,2 cm kanon m/42 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Breyten Breytenbach (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Canada-Netherlands relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Central European Hockey League (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Cynthia P. Schneider (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dieuwertje Blok (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch brig Meermin (1784) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch brig Pijl (1785) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch railway signalling (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Elze Geurts (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Flag of Bonaire (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Fokker F.XIV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Jaap Schreurs (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• NARCIS (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Nienke (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Paulien van Dooremalen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Raid on Sumatra (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Rijkswerf (Amsterdam) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• The Martyrdom of Saint Erasmus (Bouts) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Achilles '29 players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch parodists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• GS Media v Sanoma (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Driessen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kamp Amersfoort National Monument (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Michael Bresser (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Nicolaas van Wijk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• Siege of Hasselt (1657) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• The Fagel Collection (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)

November 25, 2024

Renamed

• Template:Curaçao-yachtracing-bio-stub renamed to Template:Curaçao-sailing-bio-stub.
• Template:Netherlands-yachtracing-bio-stub renamed to Template:Netherlands-sailing-bio-stub.

Reassessed

• Bep van Ipenburg-Drommel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Clemens Wijers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Denk (political party) politicians (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Hein Donner (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• New York Dutch (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Skull of a Skeleton with Burning Cigarette (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Alexandre Batta (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Curaçao-sailing-bio-stub (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• Dieuwertje Blok (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Djokosoedjono (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch sailing biography stubs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Football clubs in Raalte (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Maarten de Jong (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Netherlands-sailing-bio-stub (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in 's-Hertogenbosch (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Almere (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Alphen aan den Rijn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Altena, North Brabant (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Amstelveen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Barendrecht (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Gooise Meren (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Gorinchem (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Haarlem (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Hellendoorn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Katwijk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Leiden (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Lingewaard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Meppel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Raid on Sumatra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Zépiqueno Redmond (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Dutch yacht racing biography stubs (talk) removed.
• Luc Peters (talk) removed.

November 24, 2024

Reassessed

• Ad Valvas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Ada van Keulen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Centraal Beheer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dekemastate (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Dirk I (bishop) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Driess Saddiki (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Fokker F27 Friendship (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• General Industrial Union of Furniture Makers and Woodworkers (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan-Willem van Ewijk (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jean de la Chambre (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kitty van Haperen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Kristie Boogert (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Lehman Brothers Treasury (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Maaike (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Pieter Celie (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Q. S. Serafijn (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Royal TESO (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:ABN AMRO people (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch naval personnel of the First Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• First Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:People of the First Anglo-Dutch War (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

November 23, 2024

Reassessed

• 1981–1982 Whitbread Round the World Race (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Naktuinbouw (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Nuna 7 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:2025 European Athletics Indoor Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Curaçao League navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Curaçao national sports teams navigational boxes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch COVID-19 vaccines (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch prison administrators (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women rock singers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Maurice Verberne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Roel van Helden (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Yoesuf Foundation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)