Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Sinyavin Offensive (1942)
(old peer review here)
I would like to improve this article further to nominate it for GA and later A-Class. I think I have done everything from the previous peer review almost a year ago. I guess the weak points are style, but I am not sure. D2306 (talk) 12:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
AustralianRupert
[edit]Good work so far. Just a few presentation suggestions from me as I have no content knowledge:
- per WP:MOSHEAD the capitalisation of the "German Plans" and "Soviet Plans" headers is incorrect. It should be "German plans" and "Soviet plans";Done
- the first paragraph in the Aftermath is uncited and should at least have a citation at the end of the paragraph;Done
- the citations for the order of battle are a little unclear to me. It might be clearer if a citation was placed after the "German" and "Soviet" headers in The order of battle section;Done
- in the Notes section "Glantz p. 212-213" is different from "Meretskov pp. 301–302". Presentation style here should be the same, thus I suggest adding an endash and using "pp." where multiple pages are used as the source;Done
- Citation # 23 "Haupt W. Army Group North. The Wehrmacht in Russia 1941–1945" is presented differently to all the others. It should be the same;Done
- Is there a page number that could be added for Citation # 25 "Haupt"?
- I think the three columns for the References makes it a little hard for the reader. I would suggest just one column for the References. Three columns for the Notes is okay, though;Done
- in the References section the dates for "Manstein (1955 (2004))" are a little awkward. You can show these two dates more cleanly by using the following code "|origyear=1955 |year=2004" within the cite book template. This will show up as "(2004) [1955]". DoneAustralianRupert (talk) 04:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- All done except for the page number for "Haupt". I no longer have the book, so I can't get the page number. If you think it's better I could simply say the operation was due to begin on September 14 and cite Isayev for it. D2306 (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that would be best if you want to put it up for GA. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Done
- All done except for the page number for "Haupt". I no longer have the book, so I can't get the page number. If you think it's better I could simply say the operation was due to begin on September 14 and cite Isayev for it. D2306 (talk) 14:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)