Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Yugoslav torpedo boat T3

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by Anotherclown (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Yugoslav torpedo boat T3[edit]

Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)

Featured article candidates/Yugoslav torpedo boat T3/archive1

This steam-powered torpedo boat saw service in both WWI and WWII, finally being sunk in early 1945. She was one of the 250t-class torpedo boats whose class article I took to ACR in August last year. This article successfully went through GAN in May last year, and has had a couple of tweaks since then. All constructive criticism taken on board. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Article has no obvious issues and appears to meet the A-class criteria. Kges1901 (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments: I made a couple minor tweaks, please adjust as you see fit. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Acquired: March 1921": this appears in the infobox, but I don't think you mention it in the body of the article;
"classified as sea-going": I wonder if the significance of this could be clarified a little more?
I wonder if a general sentence could be added about what the vessel did between entering KJRM and April 1941;
"T3 was captured by the Royal Italian Navy": did the vessel put to sea, or its crew resist?
in Italian service, where did the ship operate, is it stated?

G'day AustralianRupert and Ian Rose all done, I've added a bit about a 1917 submarine attack and a bit about what the Italians used her for, per the above, see my edits. Thanks for the review! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My comments have been addressed. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me too, tks PM. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~Comment~~ -- Only a minor ce from me, reads well, logically structured and couldn't see any issues with image licensing or source reliability/formatting. I suppose it's on the cusp of what I would consider detailed enough for A-Class but I know there are precedents; be good if we could get a bit more meat on the bones a la Rupert's comments. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support What a silly article! On a Yugoslavian torpedo boat - I saw this and though it was some kind-of joke! Anyway, love it! This is an absolute delight and I wholeheartedly support! LavaBaron (talk) 01:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.