Weak AfD unless the books referenced in the article contain significant coverage. If so, or if someone finds other coverage, then the article should be kept. I found the term "model mugging" in articles not related to her. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I did not find a third-party reference linking her with Model Mugging. I did find a reference to her presidency. She seems a respectable teacher in a respectable organization - I would recommend to leave this article as not being clearly fluff. jmcw (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uncertain As a martial artist there's no reason to keep the article, but I'm not sure about his alleged criminal activities. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AFD I corrected the information in the article. He had 2 good placings in the European judo championships--2nd in 1969 and 3rd in 1970. I don't think that's quite enough to pass WP:Athlete, but others may feel differently. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Being mentioned in the Encyclopaedia Britannica is good enough for me. I added text and sourcing plus I removed the notability tag from the article. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AfD He was a medalist at the Commonwealth fencing championships. This is another one that I'd say doesn't quite meet the notability guidelines, but suspect others will disagree. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD unless all professional boxers are notable. The article consists of his boxing record and a description of his loss on The Contender television show. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
