Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Peer review/Youth Offending Team
Appearance
I created this article a long time ago after working with them for a couple of months, and am hoping to boost it beyond B class. SGGH 21:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Youth Offending Team is well written in the respect that if a reader (or even a young offender) wanted to know the processes of the YOT, he or she would have a very accurate idea. The introduction introduces the article extremely well, so no improvement is needed there. The article is laid out very well with sections and then sub-sections, which also follows the manual of style. The article does not alway explain what technical terms mean, like "reprimand", the article only tells the reader what happens if a youth is given a reprimand, there is however a link to the word reprimand explaining what it means in a separate article.
- The article has references some of which come from an official YOT leaflet while others are on the YOT website. There is no evidence in this article of original research.
- The YOT article address the aspects of the topic and the article stays focused and the subject and does giving unnecessary details.
- The article is written in Neutral point of view, which benefits the article and all views are presented fairly and without bias.
- The article is stable, there are no major changes each day, and there has been no edit wars, this article has never been in our (WP:LE) article watch list which is a good sign.
- The article contains 2 images of the YOT office in Somerset, taken by the author SGGH, and and a flow diagram showing the procedures of a Youth Offending Team which is created by the author SGGH.
Overall good article, hope one day it will be FA status
Dep. Garcia ( Talk | Help Desk | Complaints ) 12:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)