Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Baltimore–Washington Parkway

Baltimore–Washington Parkway

This is a bit out of process, but I am going to go ahead and archive this as keep. Editors have had almost two months to object to keeping this article, and have not done so. In my view, there is no prejudice to bringing this article back here, if concerns arise again, or for additional FAC prep. --Rs chen 7754 11:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion: Demote

Nominator's comments: This is a current A-Class article, but I have some concerns with it that need examination. The previous review is at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Baltimore–Washington Parkway.

Nominated by: Rs chen 7754 01:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First comment occurred:

Review by Rschen7754

Many of the paragraphs are too long, and are bloated with unnecessary information.

More later. --Rs chen 7754 01:54, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Ref 11 is dead.~~

Replaced dead link. Dough 48 72 03:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources need page numbers.
~~Is source 8 reliable?~~ --Rs chen 7754 02:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced. Dough 48 72 03:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

30 days has passed, notifications given. --Rs chen 7754 10:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting closer to a keep vote, but maybe use some abbreviations throughout the RD? --Rs chen 7754 09:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dough4872: --Rs chen 7754 07:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have gone ahead and used consistent abbreviations throughout the article. Dough 48 72 00:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I doubt that the article would pass at FAC due to comprehensive concerns, but I also don't think that it's so bad that it needs to be demoted right away. I also think that continuing this ACR will probably not result in substantial improvements. In other words, largely the same as my +1 on Kansas Turnpike. --Rs chen 7754 03:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.