Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Peer review/Leaving Las Vegas

I have followed the style guidelines for this article, and hope to make Leaving Las Vegas a Good Article. I need to make sure that I am on the right track. Thank you, Crzy cheetah 03:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Why did they choose that particular film gauge? Kaisershatner 15:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, compare with other FA films at WP:FA#Media.

Won't pass without a fair user rationale for Image:Leaving Las Vegas DVD cover.jpg. Cbrown1023 03:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Make sure the prose flows well (I noticed a slight stick, but that just may be my reading style versus your writing style...). Cbrown1023 03:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've made some changes to the article; things I didn't state here. Cbrown1023 03:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.--Crzy cheetah 08:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is very short, you could go into more detail on most of the items. Also, remember that the style guidelines are just a basis, it is great if you do more than the guidelines state. Cbrown1023 03:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cite web format for sources.
When was it shot?
If the character was described in the plot, a description in the cast section is redundant.
There is more information in the cast section than in the plot. Also, I think that the cast section would look dull without descriptions.--Crzy cheetah 08:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the cast info could be moved to production (like how they researched the parts). Usually the cast section is pretty plain, but I don't think it's a hard and fast rule.--Supernumerary 08:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting issues need to be fixed in the infobox.
Did Cbrown1023 fix them already? If not, could you point them, please?--Crzy cheetah 08:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Went ahead and made the minor change.--Supernumerary 08:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Avoid weasel words (like arguably).
Could do with some copyediting.--Supernumerary 03:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]