Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Coordinators/Election 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Film
General information (
)
Main project page + talk
→ Discussion archives
Style guidelines talk
→ Multimedia talk
→ Naming conventions talk
→ Copy-editing essentials talk
Notability guidelines talk
Announcements and open tasks talk
→ Article alerts
→ Cleanup listing
→ New articles talk
→ Nominations for deletion talk
→ Popular pages
→ Requests talk
Spotlight talk
Film portal talk
Fiction noticeboard talk
Project organization
Coordinators talk
Participants talk
Project banner talk
Project category talk
Departments
Assessment talk
→ B-Class
→ Instructions
Categorization talk
Core talk
Outreach talk
Resources talk
Review talk
Spotlight talk
→ Spotlight cleanup listing
Topic workshop talk
Task forces
General topics
Film awards talk
Film festivals talk
Film finance talk
Filmmaking talk
Silent films talk
Genre
Animated films talk
Christian films talk
Comic book films talk
Documentary films talk
Marvel Cinematic Universe talk
Skydance Media talk
War films talk
Avant-garde and experimental films talk
National and regional
American cinema talk
Argentine cinema talk
Australian cinema talk
Baltic cinema talk
Belgian cinema talk
British cinema talk
Canadian cinema talk
Chinese cinema talk
French cinema talk
German cinema talk
Indian cinema talk
Italian cinema talk
Japanese cinema talk
Korean cinema talk
Mexican cinema talk
New Zealand cinema talk
Nordic cinema talk
Pakistani cinema talk
Persian cinema talk
Southeast Asian cinema talk
Soviet and post-Soviet cinema talk
Spanish cinema talk
Uruguayan cinema talk
Venezuelan cinema talk
Templates
banner
DVD citation
DVD liner notes citation
infobox
invite
plot cleanup
stub
userbox

Overview

[edit]

The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of the project, and serve as the designated points-of-contact for procedural issues. They are not, however, endowed with any special executive powers.

The Lead Coordinator bears overall responsibility for coordinating the project; the Coordinators aid the Lead Coordinator and focus on specific areas that require special attention.

Responsibilities

[edit]

From Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators:

The primary responsibility of the project coordinators is the maintenance and housekeeping work involved in keeping the project and its internal processes running smoothly; this includes a variety of tasks, such as keeping the announcement and open task lists updated, overseeing the assessment and review processes, managing the proposal and creation of task forces, and so forth. There is fairly little involved that couldn't theoretically be done by any other editor, of course—in only a few places have the coordinators been explicitly written into a process—but, since experience suggests that people tend to assume that someone else is doing whatever needs to be done, it has proven beneficial to formally helping to informally resolve disputes and keep discussions from becoming heated and unproductive. The coordinators are not, however, a body for formal dispute resolution; serious disputes should be addressed through the normal dispute resolution process.

The coordinators also have several additional roles. They serve as the project's designated points of contact, and are explicitly listed as people to whom questions can be directed in a variety of places around the project. They also try to regularly contribute to the reviews involving film-related articles, looking out in particular for reviews which require additional voices. In addition, they have highly informal roles in leading the drafting of project guidelines, overseeing the implementation of project decisions on issues like category schemes and template use, and helping to informally resolve disputes and keep discussions from becoming heated and unproductive. The coordinators are not, however, a body for formal dispute resolution; serious disputes should be addressed through the normal dispute resolution process.

Some more specific examples of day-to-day coordinator work can be found here.

Incumbents

[edit]
Name Position Standing for re-election?
Collectonian (talk · contribs) Coordinator Yes
Erik (talk · contribs) Lead Yes
Girolamo Savonarola (talk · contribs) Coordinator No
Lugnuts (talk · contribs) Coordinator Yes
Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) Coordinator Yes
PC78 (talk · contribs) Coordinator No
Sephiroth BCR (talk · contribs) Coordinator No

More information on the history of the coordinator positions can be found here.

Election process

[edit]
  • The nominations period is currently open for two weeks, starting at 00:01 (UTC) on September 1 and ending at 23:59 (UTC) on September 14. However, if the candidate pool does not exceed the number of open positions (7) by at least 5 nominations by the end of the nominations period, then nominations will be allowed through to the end of the voting period.
  • The election will run for two weeks, starting at 00:01 (UTC) on September 15 and ending at 23:59 (UTC) on September 28.
  • Any WP:FILMS member can nominate themselves for a position if they have at least 500 edits at the start of the nomination period (September 1, 2009). Nominees should add the below boilerplate to the "Candidates" section below by the start of the election.

=== Name ===
{{user|Name}}
: Statement goes here...

==== Comments and questions for Name ====
* ''What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?''
** Response goes here...
* ''What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?''
** Response goes here...

==== Votes in support of Name ====
#
  • The election will be conducted using simple approval voting. Any member of the project may support as many of the candidates as they wish. The candidate with the highest number of endorsements will become the Lead Coordinator (provided he or she is willing to assume the post); the next six candidates will become Coordinators. The number of Coordinators may be increased if there is a tie or near-tie for the last position.
  • Both project members and interested outside parties are encouraged to ask questions of the nominees or make general comments.

Candidates

[edit]
Voting is now concluded.

Current time is 16:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Andrzejbanas

[edit]

Andrzejbanas (talk · contribs)

Hello fellow film-fanatics! This is my first time applying to be a coordinator for WP:Films. I've been on Wikipedia since 2006 simply adding infoboxes to the film articles, to eventually figuring out how the whole system works. I was helped by several editors in my junior years here who taught me the ropes and I'd like to show new users the same respect and attitude that I was shown so I do not feel overcome by some standards applied to by Wikipedia.

Comments and questions for Andrzejbanas

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • I've worked quite hard on several articles on foreign and classic films. Some of which have passed for Good article status. These include Rififi, The Orphanage, and Vampyr. Don't let the foreign and classic films put you off as me being pretentious, as I also worked on filmography articles for James Cameron and Robert Rodriguez. I also (for some reason) worked to pass the Jean-Claude Van Damme film Hard Target as a good article! :)
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • As a co-coordinator I'd like to help as many new users as I can in aiding them to pursue their goals and help educate them about Wikipedia standards. I pay close attention WP:Films front and talk page often making edits that announce new GA-nominations as well as clearing out old films which do not meet their standards anymore. I try to handle disputes by talking them out on talk pages with new users rather then simply reverting them as I do not wish to scare any newcomers away. What I will attempt to do as coordinator would be to review more GA noms so users will not have to wait a month to find out if their article they've been working hard on has passed for GA-quality.

Votes in support of Andrzejbanas

[edit]
  1. Nothing wrong with being first to support! You seem like a good candidate to me. Camaron · Christopher · talk 15:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Coordinators need to have patience when dealing with novice contributors, and the fact you're willing to offer new editors the same respect and attitude you received wins my vote. Hopefully some of your positive attitude will rub off on others who lack it completely. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 18:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Excellent contributor, look forward to interacting with you more. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wonderfully prolific editor; happy to see him step into the spotlight! :) Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 00:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sounds like a good candidate to me. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Very thorough and conscientious, willing to offer help and seek assistance from others. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. LargoLarry (talk) 12:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I'm happy to support "new blood". MovieMadness (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. —97198 (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Andrzej has been making good edits and works well with others. -Krasnoludek (talk) 13:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bertaut (talk) 15:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Looks good to me. Regards, decltype (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support. Loved the work you did on Hard Target and Robert Rodriguez. You've got my vote! J.D. (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support. Will make a fine addition to the team! PC78 (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support. Feel like a good editor to me. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 13:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support. We could use more like you, and since it appears obvious you will be a shoo-in, congrats as well! Jusdafax 06:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bird

[edit]

Big Bird (talk · contribs)

I've been a Wikipedian for over three years now. It took me a little while to find a specific field of interest; I used to edit very nomadically but the bulk of my edits from the last year or so have been film related. Even though I'm not a GA/FA contributor just yet, I do enjoy helping others whenever I can and I think this WikiProject would benefit from my increased involvement.

Comments and questions for Big Bird

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • I've created over 50 articles so far, most of which were about films or were film related. I've also significantly expanded a few stub articles, Meet the Parents being the one on which I did the largest amount of work. Even though it's not GA material yet, Meet the Parents was a stub when I first got to it and now, 150 edits later, I believe, it's a pretty solid B-class article which I'm currently trying to upgrade to GA. I've written or expanded nine articles which were featured in the Did you Know? section of the main page, all but two of those being films or film related. The most recent DYK credit to my name is for Asylum Seekers which was nominated for deletion and looked like this when I started editing it but I was able to single-handedly save it from deletion and expand it to DYK quality before the AfD debate was finished.
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • I have a solid grasp of policies and guidelines and am able to discuss them civilly and intelligently as well as explain them to any newcomers or editors needing help. As most other people on WP Films, I posses pretty extensive knowledge about individual films and enjoy sharing this information whenever it can be used to help improve this WikiProject. I'm not afraid or unwilling to do cleanup or minor tedious edits either so I'd be glad to be able to help in that regard.

Votes in support of Big Bird

[edit]
  1. I have found Big Bird pleasant to work with, and the Asylum Seekers rescue is very commendable. :) Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 13:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. As above, good work already, and more to come. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Being a GA/FA contributor is admirable, but someone needs to take the first step to help articles achieve that status by expanding stubs and cleaning up articles that desperately need it. You've done good work and I anticipate seeing a lot more. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 13:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. Nice to see a new name stepping forward! Lugnuts (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No problems here. Good luck! decltype (talk) 14:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support. Will make a fine addition to the team! PC78 (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Started 50 articles? Good work, and thanks for stepping up! Jusdafax 07:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bovineboy2008

[edit]

Bovineboy2008 (talk · contribs)

Hello everyone. I am kind of a new Wikipedian to the Film project, although I have now been contributing consistently for over a year and a half. I think that the project is going through some major changes right now and I feel my views could have a great deal of help with the stability and helpfulness of new, changing, or old policies and guidelines. I have worked in a lot of other projects, including WP:VG and WP:TV, as well as trying to branch out into the WP:ACTOR project.

Comments and questions for Bovineboy2008

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • Although I haven't created m/any film articles or brought them up to GA or FA status, I have helped in maintaining a lot of lists, including lists of films and box-office information. I am always up to updating really old articles to conform with newer guidelines and changes in templates and infoboxes.
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • I have probably seen every animated film since 2000 (thanks in part to my little brother) and while these films are often overlooked, they really are an art in the film industry and I am willing to work with these sorts of articles. I am usually swift in posts to talk pages on the project or some of the articles' talk pages. I am willing to do rough copy-edits and formatting references to be more useful, and I am always willing to collaborate on or "have a look" at articles other users want help with.

Votes in support of Bovineboy2008

[edit]
  1. LargoLarry (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Can always count on this editor for a productive and civil exchange. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 14:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Being willing to wade into the animated realm shows the guts to be a coordinator :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support. Lugnuts (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. It's nice to see some "young blood" among the "oldtimers"! MovieMadness (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Always nice to have new blood, looks good to me. Camaron · Christopher · talk 15:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Has done well contributing to discussions in the past, believe you will do well helping out with coordinator discussions. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Great worker with great ideas. --Pedro J. the rookie 14:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Why not? decltype (talk) 14:58, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support per above comments. Thanks for being willing to devote the time and energy! Jusdafax 07:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Collectonian

[edit]

Collectonian (talk · contribs)

Seeking "reelection", I guess? :-) I've done one term as a coordinator, and while I'm not sure how well I did, I'd be interested in continuing if others felt I did well. For the short summary of my editing for those who don't know me, I'm approaching my five year anniversary of editing at Wikipedia and now have over 80,000 edits under my belt, with a good 20% or so of my edits are in the user and article talk spaces. In addition to my work with Film articles, I'm heavily active in the Anime and manga project, a strong supporter of the implementation of the MoS for film articles, and a firm believer in the use of reliable sources. Sometimes hot tempered when "defending" an article against vandalism, OR, or excessive plot, but it all stems from a passionate love of Wikipedia in general, and my personal belief that the article, and their quality, should always come first.

Comments and questions for Collectonian

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • As I mentioned at the last election, I'm proud that I was able to take several "B" movie artcles up from really bad stubs to GA articles, including Category 6: Day of Destruction, Grizzly Rage, and Maneater. I'm also particularly proud that I took White Dog, a film I was surpised to find had only a very small stub considering its history, up to GA status. Since the last election, I also gained my first film featured article, Meerkat Manor: The Story Begins, which is part of the Meerkat Manor featured topic and our seventh FA for the year. Also had three film DYKs :)
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • I am a firm believer in following the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia (without rules, there is only chaos), and, as noted, a great fan/believer in the Film MoS. I'm not afraid to "jump into the fray" when dealing with inexperienced editors or overly eager fans who may not be as concerned about the quality of articles or may not know what is and is not appropriate content. At times, it works against me, and I won't hide my having a couple 3RR blocks from losing patience and not letting others deal with it (and from being online WAY too much). I can be a bit anal and a mild neat-freak, so dealing with organizational related tasks doesn't bother me at all. I'm gaining skill in using AWB to handle more tedious tasks, as well. More than anything, I enjoy editing and would like to help to continue to support the Film project in growing in maturity and awesomeness, and expanding our . I'm also not biased towards are article, having no qualms about delisting our GAs or sending Film articles for FA if they no longer meet the appropriate criteria, or tagging articles with issues. I also perform tough, but I'd like to think fair, GAN reviews that are nearly bullet proof when they pass.

Votes in support of Collectonian

[edit]
  1. I've also re-added myself; I look forward to having a firm anal believer under her belt in this fray. LOL Bzuk (talk) 03:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 11:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. Lugnuts (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. kollision (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I have had quite a lot of interaction with Collectonian, I am sure she will continue the good work as a coordinator. Camaron · Christopher · talk 15:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Glad you readded your nomination, you did well for the last term, contributing to many discussions both here and on the main film page.--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cirt (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. —97198 (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support. -Krasnoludek (talk) 13:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support. -Garbolia --Garbolia (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. You've done well, but try to keep your cool a bit more in the future :) decltype (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support. Seem to have a lot of experience. Invmog (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — CactusWriter | needles 06:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Could have sworn I supported you earlier. Support! Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support, and here again I need to thank the candidate for services rendered and willingness to continue on! Jusdafax 07:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erik

[edit]

Erik (talk · contribs)

Hello, everyone! I am a long-time contributor to Wikipedia, most especially articles under WikiProject Films. I have been a coordinator for three terms, including being the lead coordinator for the present term. Wikipedia is a work in progress, so by extension, WikiProject Films is a work in progress. I would like to help it progress by promoting best practices and providing guidance for editors new and old. I also ask other editors who participate in the election to consider being candidates themselves. If you have a penchant for discussion, throw your hat in the ring! Wikipedia is an ongoing learning experience for all of us.

Comments and questions for Erik

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • I have written multiple Good Articles, both on my own and in collaboration with others. I have also written a Featured Article, Fight Club, which has been a long-term pet project for me. I am most proud of article-building because the greatest aspect of Wikipedia is to inform so publicly. It is nice to see that film articles on Wikipedia are often at the top of search engines' results and that page view statistics show the number of people that read the articles daily. Another achievement that holds a certain pride for me is my work on the WikiProject's guidelines to update them with best practices. I have rewritten existing sections to be more modern and have contributed new sections for previously unaddressed elements of film articles.
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • I enjoy helping other editors and collaborating with them. The revision history statistics for WT:FILM show that I have over 770 edits on the WikiProject's main talk page, more than any other editor. I try to make WikiProject Films a welcoming place for everyone, and I like to collaborate with others on figuring out solutions for individual articles or completing objectives on the agenda for WikiProject Films. My article-building experience has taught me about the best resources to use, and I do my best to share them with other editors. In summary, my experience in article-building and working with other editors qualifies me as a candidate who can collaborate with other coordinators to improve WikiProject Films and its related articles.
  • What are your goals as a Films coordinator?
    • I wrote this question for myself in the last election, and I'm repeating it for this election. In this past term, I put together an agenda for the coordinators so we can have a better picture of what objectives could be accomplished. My goal is to accomplish some of these objectives and work toward others' completion (as some are long-term). For example, I want to continue improving the guidelines to address any persistent issues in film articles and to guide editors in writing solid film articles. Most editors will edit film articles in passing, and I believe that we can recruit some to become more dedicated contributors if we collaborate with them and show them that there is a community from which they can draw resources. My impression is that there are several "lone wolves" who contribute great works, and I hope to find and motivate editors to both contribute great works and help others contribute similar works, may it be through peer review or sharing of resources.

Votes in support of Erik

[edit]
  1. Can't think of a better candidate. Bzuk (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 11:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LargoLarry (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I still remember how helpful Erik was to me as a newcomer. His patience and finesse in dealing with other editors should serve as a lesson to everyone. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Lugnuts (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. kollision (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. MovieMadness (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Camaron · Christopher · talk 15:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Superb job as lead this last term, and look forward to addressing more of the issues/discussion points you initially raised. In addition, I need to vote for you so you outweigh my votes before I somehow become the lead (where did all these votes come from?). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. No-brainer. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Cirt (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Erik is a model Wikipedia editor and project coordinator. Melty girl 04:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —97198 (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Eric is the man! SilkTork *YES! 06:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jumbolino (talk) 10:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support. -Krasnoludek (talk) 13:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. -Garbolia --Garbolia (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. PmlineditorTalk 12:45, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Definitely. decltype (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support. Sayerslle (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support. You've always displayed a great attitude, work hard and contribute so much. J.D. (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. — CactusWriter | needles 06:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support, and an honor to do so! Jusdafax 07:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts

[edit]

Lugnuts (talk · contribs)

Hello! I've been involved in editing on WP for a few years now, with the vast majority of edits around WP:FILM.

Comments and questions for Lugnuts

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • I've now created over 6,500 articles for the project. Over the past year I've been working on the Cannes Film Festival since 1946 to fill in the gaps of missing films, directors, actors and adding references to existing articles. Yes, I do start lots of stubs, but I believe there is a Wiki-Culture that puts of some users (esp. new people) from creating articles (tagging instead of helping, un-friendly interface, etc). Quite a fair few of the articles I start then get expanded by other users. My proudest new article was my my 6,000th, by one of my favourite directors, which turned out to be the Palme d'Or winner this year.
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • Tagging and categorizing articles. Many film articles are missing essential categories and tags, and I ensure that to the best of my ability I add the relevant tags/categories.

Votes in support of Lugnuts

[edit]
  1. Let me be the first to support your nomination. A very conscientious member of the project. Bzuk (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. LargoLarry (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Tagging and catting is often overlooked and undesirable; definitely need more folks willing to do! -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. kollision (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MovieMadness (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Solid editor; definitely brings a helpful perspective on film stubs. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 15:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Camaron · Christopher · talk 15:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Great contributor to various areas of the project, and it would be great to see you in another term. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Absolutely. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Definite support. -Krasnoludek (talk) 13:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Good luck! decltype (talk) 15:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Lugnuts! Precious Lugnuts! Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support. Sayerslle (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. — CactusWriter | needles 06:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Stunning amount of work. Bravo! Jusdafax 07:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nehrams2020

[edit]

Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs)

Hello fellow WP:FILMS' members! I have served as a coordinator for the project for the last four terms, and still enjoy helping out members and improving the project behind-the-scenes. Films are one of my main focuses on Wikipedia, and when I'm not working on images, GAs, or other areas, I'm off watching more films (or for the most fun, watching films while editing Wikipedia!). I continue to work on writing the monthly newsletter, greeting new members, and helping other editors to improve their writing skills for film articles. I'm eager to continue to help the project expand and improve its content, and look forward to the upcoming Tag & Assess drive.

Comments and questions for Nehrams2020

[edit]
  • What have been the achievements of which you are most proud within WikiProject Films?
    • I've been proud of my various GA/FA/FLs related to the project as well as just improving articles that are stubs, have poor grammar, excessive plots, missing infoboxes, etc. It's always great to see somebody improving an article to a higher class, and hopefully some of the articles I have worked on have been used as models for improving other articles. Contributing to the newsletter has been fun to write each month, and I like using it to help members connect on common issues and articles that need assistance. I have also enjoyed getting multiple free images that have been used for various film articles, and am always looking for more to further improve other articles.
  • What skills/qualities can you contribute as a Films coordinator?
    • As an administrator, I can help with assorted issues that arise for members that need assistance. I try to take part in discussions when I can, and usually contribute to many of the issues raised on the coordinator discussion page. I have worked with or know of many of the members of the projects, and do my best to assume good faith and help others when I can (my talk page is always open). I believe that allows for the best way in improving article content while also providing a great environment for new members to consider joining the project. Finally, I've watched a lot films, so I usually can weigh in on discussions that are for individual films.

Votes in support of Nehrams2020

[edit]
  1. A good candidate. Bzuk (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. LargoLarry (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Peppagetlk 16:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Lugnuts (talk) 18:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Admirable work done on articles film-related and otherwise; always amicable and contributive in discussions. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 19:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. kollision (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MovieMadness (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Camaron · Christopher · talk 15:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Cirt (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. —97198 (talk) 06:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Very accomplished Coordinator and very kind to help others. Support!!! Garbolia --Garbolia (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. But of course. decltype (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support. Sayerslle (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support. J.D. (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. — CactusWriter | needles 06:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support, you round out a fine list of candidates. Thanks for all your work! Jusdafax 07:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

[edit]

Please make any general comments not related to one of the candidates on the talk page.

Results

[edit]

Andrzejbanas, Big Bird, Bovineboy2008, Collectonian, Erik, Lugnuts, and Nehrams2020 will fill the seven coordinator slots based on the above tally of votes.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Coordinators/Election_5&oldid=1145844656"