Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine/Collaboration

Navigation:

Collaboration on articles helps speed up the creation and improvement of articles. Please feel free to inform others in the Clinical Medicine Project about work you are starting, wish collaboration on or seek peer review for.

For older collaborations, see archive.

1) Topics we are currently working on

This is a list of current projects. Individuals may not want to review them yet, since they may not be complete.

Hypotonia - would appreciate some professional collaboration on this article, particularly in dividing underlying causes into categories (bacterial infections, viral infections, congenital diseases, neurological disorders, etc.), and just a general overview for medical accuracy. MamaGeek Joy 15:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are too many ways of spliting - neurological and muscular, or genetic or developmental, congenital or acquired. I've had a go with congenital vs aquired, but the reader will have to look at each entry (eg meningitis can be viral or bacterial) David Ruben ^Talk 00:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amygdala - this one is stable now, but might soon tend to stray from the track. FranklinT 01:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Chronic Pain- I have substantially revised the outline and text and I am in the process of further elaboration and reference enhancement.Robert J. Kaplan 02:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Rkapla02[reply]

2) Request for collaboration

This is a list of pages being worked upon where individuals would appreciate the active help of others in discussing and developing an article.

3) Things up for review

This is a list of recently completed pages that request review for factual/design/completeness reasons

Joncomelately

I've pretty new here but I've expanded aseptic meningitis as it was on the stub list, and also because it may be vaguely relevant to my finals revision. It's my first attempt at one of these, so won't be great. It could probably do with a couple more pictures and some history, and maybe a few more references. Would appreciate a review at some point. Cheers Iain Joncomelately 17:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed some links, faults, names. It seems to be good. I don't know what kind of images we should put into the article. And there are no external links. NCurse_work 13:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just created a page on Gallop rhythms, and would appreciate some feedback on that at some point. Also, I edited a bit of Congestive heart failure which seemed a bit odd to me, and have made a note about it on the talk page. If anybody disagrees, please let me know. Cheers Iain Joncomelately 10:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review of Surgery requested

The high-importance article Surgery has recently been substantially expanded. A peer review is requested to ensure Surgery is technically sound. If anybody wants to review Surgery and make any [beneficial] edits, please go ahead. Also if anybody can provide any references for it, please go right ahead. H Padleckas 03:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for peer-review of Influenza

Hi there. I'm trying to improve this page at the moment. Feedback and suggestions would be most welcome. This is the review page. Thank you. TimVickers 02:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]