Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Peer review/Red-tailed Hawk
This was on that list of "substantial articles which may be FAs/GAs", so I rearranged some of the sections, added some more refs and more information. A few other WikiProject Birds members have contributed too. Anyway, I thought I'd put it in for a peer review to get some feedback. cheers, Jude. 00:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- "The dark and intermediate morphs constitute 10–20% of the population." I think an inline cite is needed there. Also, this may just be me, but in the taxobox, why aren't there pretty little circles for the conservation status area, with the LC circle highlighted? I like it better that way - I think it looks better. Oh yeah, and maybe make the little paragraph about voice it's own section? I think it's fine either way, what do you more experienced editors think? Cheers, Corvus coronoides 00:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Had a few minutes spare and changed a couple of obvious things. make sure each of the photos used adds something to the article - it would be great to work in some of the gallery photos. eg. In Desription is rufous morph photo - why not subtitle one in taxobox (which looks the same) and use a ne one from the gallery here? also in distribution habitat - just a bird on a pole. Have a play. Have a priority list and work down form there. This article hasa luxury of interesting photos. Will help out more later. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- The refs are a little webby and general; there should be some good journal articles on this species. If you need access to any of the ones not avaliable on SORA let me know. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- More sourcing in the lead, maybe? I'll try to tackle it after I finish packing for vacation, but might not have time. Cheers, Corvus coronoides 18:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)