Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/A-class review/Karmichael Hunt/Archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of this discussion is: request denied; awaiting result of FAC.
I feel this is A-class material. SpecialWindler 03:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the only reservation I have is the presence of the "needs free image" template, but I think that is a big one, as it definitely gives the impression of incompleteness from the instant you see the article. I regret to say that I have to see it as being probably enough to withhold A-Class, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that no such images of the subject, even old school pictures, exist. I do note that the picture doesn't have to be notable current, just a free image. John Carter 17:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Well I'm working on that. SpecialWindler 21:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If you feel that it's not A class, you can not class it and I will re apply it to here when it has a free image. SpecialWindler 21:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A new free image has been added in place SpecialWindler talk 05:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If you feel that it's not A class, you can not class it and I will re apply it to here when it has a free image. SpecialWindler 21:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Well I'm working on that. SpecialWindler 21:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral. The article could indeed use some copyediting, especially in the 2006 and 2007 sections. If the copyedit banner is removed (when the concerns have been addressed), I'll be happy to support A-class. Errabee 12:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It is really hard to say an article that has an existing "needs ..." template (photo, copyediting, whatever) on it is A-class. If the copyediting concerns are addressed, I don't think that I would have any qualms about supporting it. John Carter
- I'm working on it. SpecialWindler talk 05:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The page was proofread by User:Miriam joy and I feel is ready for another check for A-Class review. SpecialWindler 09:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm working on it. SpecialWindler talk 05:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It has been copyedited thrice now, (by ONUnicorn, Sticks66and Fishal). See the history. It should be given A-class status, if anyone respons. I will query any problems immediately (or as soon as I can) SpecialWindler talk 04:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is now up for Featured Article Status as a FAC, due to no response from this A-Class review. SpecialWindler talk 06:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Don't be judgemental. We have given you feedback, and you should be grateful for that. We *do* have real lifes, you know. I'm failing this review for two reasons:
- If it passes FAC, it has no use for A-class anymore
- All those infoboxes make the article look very messy.
- 13:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.