Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 April 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 19 << Mar | April | May >> April 21 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 20

[edit]

03:55, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Arismauve

[edit]

I posted News that y'all want, and in news they said "single" as I Forgive You. But Why declined? I really can't understand Arismauve (talk) 03:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arismauve: One source by itself, no matter how good it is, cannot support a Wikipedia article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:02, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Biospeleologist

[edit]

Please Suggest how to modify for publishing my article Mandhip Khol in wikipedia. Biospeleologist (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:31, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Цымбалов Данил

[edit]

В чем проблема? Цымбалов Данил (talk) 06:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Цымбалов Данил: This is the English-language Wikipedia. We have zero use for content that is not in English. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[Automated translation - ru] Это англоязычная Википедия. Мы не можем использовать контент, написанный не на английском языке. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07:08, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Jamesmfinnegan

[edit]

Why is this not acceptable? Jamesmfinnegan (talk) 07:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was deleted as a test page, as it had no content. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see the deleted drafts, but judging from the messages on your user talk page, you need to read what Wikipedia is not carefully. ColinFine (talk) 19:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:56, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Caeid

[edit]

Hello, I hope this message finds you well. We have submitted our request some times and it just got rejected. As you know, we have a product with a long history but the last release date was 2 weeks ago. There are lots of pages in this field that have the same content and the same sources and they got approved but it's strange about our page that just rejected. We used as many sources and references as we can and we expect to get approved. Please help us in this regard Caeid (talk) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Caeid: "We"? This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further, and odds are the other articles you're looking at were never drafted. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a place to tell the world about your company or your products: that is called promotion and is forbidden anywhere in Wikipedia.
If several people wholly unconnected with you and your associates, and not fed information by or on behalf of you (eg interviews, press releases) have chosen to write about your company at length, and been published in reliable sources, then there could be an article about your company. It would be based almost 100% on what those sources had said about you - good and bad - and not on what you or your associates say or want to say.
You are strongly discouraged from trying to write such an article, because it will be even harder for you because of your conflict of interest than it otherwise would. If you choose to do so anyway, then having found your indepedent sources, you would have to do the difficult step of forgetting everything you know about the company, and writing a neutral summary of what those sources said - even if you disagreed with some of what they said. Do you see why this is discouraged?
As for those other articles: please see other stuff exists. ColinFine (talk) 19:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:15, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Sadikul Masduq

[edit]

I have updated my article you can check now. Sadikul Masduq (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sadikul Masduq: This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21:31, 20 April 2024 review of submission by Beatrix leo

[edit]

Why my article is showing me that this submission is declined? Beatrix leo (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was thoroughly promotional and has been deleted. 331dot (talk) 21:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]