Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 September 1
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 31 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 2 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 1
[edit]03:37, 1 September 2023 review of submission by Queenvictoria
[edit]I would like to know how to communicate with the decliner (Jamiebuba) so that I can correct the article. Do I contact them directly on their talk page? Do I add an AFC comment below theirs on the article? Or do I communicate on the subject here? Or on the articles talk page?
I see that they view the NYT and Forbes articles as trivial mentions. Should I remove the sentence that cites them and remove the citations?
Thanks in advance. Queen Victoria (talk) 03:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Queenvictoria You do not need to remove them, you just have to provide additional sources that discuss the subject indepth. NYT is a Reliable sources but we require sources that demonstrate the subject is indeed notable. Jamiebuba (talk) 06:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
12:58, 1 September 2023 review of submission by 31.223.116.133
[edit]I have recently communicated with the artist. He states that he has now an interview online, as well as credible accomplishments. Is this enough for a Wikipedia page 31.223.116.133 (talk) 12:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- I've no idea what draft you're referring to, as your edit history shows nothing, and there is no Draft:Georgie P. But no, an interview cannot be used to establish notability (assuming that's what you're asking about?), so this wouldn't help in any case. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
17:50, 1 September 2023 review of submission by 39.34.177.206
[edit]they have many valid citing. 39.34.177.206 (talk) 17:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, your article has been rejected and will not be considered further. Qcne (talk) 18:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
17:52, 1 September 2023 review of submission by 39.34.177.206
[edit]I have recently communicated with the artist. He states that he has now an interview online, as well as credible accomplishments. Is this enough for a Wikipedia page 39.34.177.206 (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, sorry. We need independent sources (so not interviews) and accomplishments alone don't help either (an independent, secondary source about those accomplishments would be fine though). -- asilvering (talk) 17:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
18:39, 1 September 2023 review of submission by Incognitopublisher
[edit]Please assist me in eliminating unreliable sources from this article. Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Any such effort would be academic, as your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 19:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)