Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 March 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 25 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 27 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 26

[edit]

00:09:39, 26 March 2023 review of submission by 24.45.0.66

[edit]

I want to include a wiki page for Toy Story 3 in real life because I was inspired by the live action toy story wiki page.

24.45.0.66 (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Find three or more reliable and independent secondary sources that have covered that subject in significant depth and extent, and report back. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:25:14, 26 March 2023 review of draft by Snorlaxjen

[edit]


Hi

can you please help, I have submitted this page a couple of times but been told that the sources aren’t reliable, but I have reference back to major UK newspapers and websites such as the BBC which are trustworthy sources. This person also has sources related to Cambridge university and various mainstream media.  When I was told there were too many web sources I removed some to avoid confusion 

Can you provide some further guidelines on what is acceptable source material in order to get this page approved ?

Thanks Snorlaxjen (talk) 11:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Snorlaxjen: the statement not adequately supported by reliable sources can mean two different things, either some or all of the sources aren't reliable, or the sources don't adequately support the draft. At a quick glance, I'd say both are the case here. Firstly, although there are indeed some reliable sources cited, others are distinctly non-reliable. Secondly, far too much of the content is unreferenced, incl. some private personal details (see WP:BLP about why this is a particular problem).
On a separate but related point, the sources may also not be sufficient to establish notability. Please see the general notability guideline for details of what sort of sources are needed for this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:40:40, 26 March 2023 review of draft by Rajmama

[edit]


Rajmama (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your question, @Rajmama? The draft has been submitted and is awaiting review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]