Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 9 << May | June | Jul >> June 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 10

[edit]

03:23, 10 June 2023 review of submission by 2600:1700:A5F:480:D423:850C:F7C2:507

[edit]

why was this page denied 2600:1700:A5F:480:D423:850C:F7C2:507 (talk) 03:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read the decline notice? As it says there, this is insufficiently referenced, with no evidence of notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03:57, 10 June 2023 review of submission by Dashmeshfzp

[edit]

Hello Dear, this article is related Indian movies and music video director, this person is very well known in his industry, so we want this article published in your honorable web page.

Regards Dashmeshfzp (talk) 03:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dashmeshfzp: there isn't, at present, even the slightest indication of any sort of notability. You need to find multiple sources that meet the WP:GNG standard.
Who is "we"? Wikipedia user accounts are strictly for a single individual only. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If he is well known in his industry, you need to be able to clearly demonstrate how and why with reliable secondary sources. This is Wikipedia's notability guideline. Guninvalid (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04:41, 10 June 2023 review of submission by 103.81.77.103

[edit]

Help us to get this published 103.81.77.103 (talk) 04:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no. the draft has been rejected. we will not consider it further. lettherebedarklight晚安 07:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04:43, 10 June 2023 review of submission by Shadysbook

[edit]

Can you suggest to get this publish. This company Indias biggest fertility clinic franchise Shadysbook (talk) 04:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadysbook: there's nothing to suggest; this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please try. There are many hospitals getting on wikipedia page. WHy not Oasis Fertility? Shadysbook (talk) 09:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Please try" what? As I said, rejection means this draft won't be considered further. I get that you've been hired to write this, but we've reached the end of the road, I'm afraid. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If I'm getting you correctly, you're asking us to ask our higher-ups, essentially. Well, you've reached the highest level of the hierarchy – all editors are mostly equal, some have advanced permissions to carry out certain acts but that doesn't make them any further up in the hierarchy, so there's no higher-ups we can ask. I don't know what you want us to do now. An AFC reviewer (a user with some advanced permissions trusted with making good decisions relating to accepting and declining ADC drafts) has determined Oasis was not notable enough for Wikipedia and certainly didn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, several others had previously determined probably wasn't notable and requested more sources showing it passed those two guidelines, which it never passed. There is no rank above editor, so we can't suggest this to get published by anybody else. Apologies. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06:24, 10 June 2023 review of submission by JabirAV

[edit]

I want to know where on the spot and what citations used of this article that makes it unreliable. I am very engrossed of this article and what makes it not notable and I would very love to know why. Continuing, I do also need to know and see how a proper wikipedia article is written so that I really could get the gist of it. It would be very helpful to me so I can see what I need to learn JabirAV (talk) 06:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. The sources given seem to merely document this person's activities, and are not significant coverage of the person in independent reliable sources that shows how he meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person- sources that describe how they see him as significant/important/influential. 331dot (talk) 07:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For examples of Wikipedia pages, you can take a look at the Wikipedia pages for other streamers and youtubers. Pick your favorite or least favorite. Better yet, pick multiple. Just remember before you start writing to demonstrate how Moonmoon meets Wikipedia's notability guideline for people. Guninvalid (talk) 16:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:13, 10 June 2023 review of submission by Adeyemo Taoheed

[edit]

This is my first article that i will publish here . please help me out, please i don't want it to get delete . if i do any thing that is not good , let me know and i will correct ,myself Thanks Adeyemo Taoheed (talk) 18:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have submitted it for review and it is pending. 331dot (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Articles on Wikipedia must meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Since Jonathan Ross is an athlete, he needs to meet the criteria for Wikipedia's guidelines on notability for people and Wikipedia's guidelines on notability for athletes. This is a high bar and your sources don't show how Jonathan Ross clears that. His team may warrant an article, but he himself may not. This could be merged with an article on his team with a subsection on him, but unless you can demonstrate with reliable secondary sources that this meets the notability guidelines, you might just have to wait. Guninvalid (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20:29, 10 June 2023 review of submission by ElWeyMamon

[edit]

My draft was declined, how do i make it better so they can accept it? ElWeyMamon (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ElWeyMamon As the reviewer told you, we already have Deaths in 2023. By definition, to be included there, the person must meet the definition of a notable person, so your draft is unnecessary. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you guys have to delete the deaths section on the years articles (until 1980) (i just want to know) ElWeyMamon (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The best place to ask that would probably be on an article talk page. 331dot (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22:46, 10 June 2023 review of submission by AlexJWBrown

[edit]

All I was trying to do is add this compilation of animated shorts for Superman to the page titled List of television series based on DC Comics publications. I literally pasted the exact wikipedia links in my entry. Why isnt the system simply able to recognize I'm referencing a source that has already been verified? Is it not possible for the system to recognize its own hyperlinks? AlexJWBrown (talk) 22:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AlexJWBrown I may be mistaken but you seem to be asking about an existing article; this page is for seeking help with drafts. You may use the more general Help Desk to seek editing assistance. 331dot (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23:33, 10 June 2023 review of submission by Theheckwhy

[edit]

I’m not really sure about the rejection reason. I’ve read the wikipedia guide page and what I understood it’s that he doesn’t have enough media coverage enough to have an wikipedia page himself? I’m sorry, I just want to make sure if I can do anything about it in terms of editing it, or he is just purely not yet qualified to have a wikipedia page. Thanks.

Theheckwhy (talk) 23:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry, I’ve tagged on the wrong Park Tae-joon. The one I’m doing is currently a South Korean taekwondo athlete and how can I refer it properly? Theheckwhy (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I assume you're referring to Draft:Park Tae-joon. Yes, that is what WP:TOOSOON means. He may be notable in the future, but as of now, he does not warrant a full article. Unless you can demonstrate with reliable secondary sources that he already meets Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, Wikipedia's guidelines for real persons, and Wikipedia's guidelines for athletes, this article is a lost cause.

Essentially, you have 3 options. You can:
  1. Demonstrate that he already is notable.
  2. Wait until he is notable, then demonstrate that he is.
  3. Bin this article entirely and add him to anything he has done that is already notable. This could mean you might include him on the Wikipedia article for some championships or events he has participated in as a contestant.
Of course, you're still welcome to try the article in your own sandbox. Mostly just make sure it doesn't get deleted while you wait for him to become notable lol Guninvalid (talk) 23:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]