Help desk
< February 15	<< Jan \| February \| Mar >>	February 17 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

February 16

09:07:07, 16 February 2023 review of submission by CirclesAndTriangles

CirclesAndTriangles (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Trials24 GmbH (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey, I'm wondering what actually needs to be adjusted on the post to make it suitable? I'm not really finding any examples which will help, I can re-edit the post, but the reason keeps coming up is the references, which has been changed and adjusted I'm really keen to get this on.

Do I need a similar set up to this - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinlife ? CirclesAndTriangles (talk) 09:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CirclesAndTriangles The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Note that the German Wikipedia may have different rules about what is acceptable article content than the English Wikipedia, which tends to be stricter than other language versions. The English Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a business and what it does. An article about a business must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the business, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable business. "Significant coverage" goes beyond telling about the activities of the company and goes into detail about what the source sees as significant or influential about the company. 331dot (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for this company, that must be declared, please see WP:PAID as well as WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:41:26, 16 February 2023 review of submission by Adem jashari99

Adem jashari99 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Xsoundbeatz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Adem jashari99 (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Adem jashari99, you do not ask a question but after several submissions and reviews the draft was rejected so will no longer be considered. S0091 (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So that means that no article about these artists will be accepted Adem jashari99 (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this time, no. It doesn't mean forever, but you have not shown that this person meets our definition of a notable creative professional or a notable musician. It's possible that the Macedonian Wikipedia, which likely has different requirements as it has different editors and policies, would accept an article about him. 331dot (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:55:47, 16 February 2023 review of draft by Engmaj

Engmaj (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Madeleva Manifesto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I had drafted this article in my sandbox. User:Engmaj/sandbox3 and was in the process of making it a live article by cutting and pasting each section. (This is not the first article I have created that way.) One problem--all of my footnotes and reference list did not come over properly. Is there a way to move this as a block so that I don't need to re-enter each one?

Another is that someone moved it too quickly to draft space and added all these tags. I have communicated with Silikonz who has apologized for quick fingers.

I was using https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Manifesto_of_the_343 as a model, which included the text of the manifesto being described. That section has been eliminated from my draft. Can I return it?

Thanks for the help!

Engmaj (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Engmaj, User:Engmaj/sandbox3 still exists. Your options are submit to AfC for Review and if accepted it will be moved. Go to WP:RM to handle a move to mainspace. Or you can use the WP:PAGEMOVE tool in the top right to move your sandbox to the main space page title. Cutting and pasting section by section is ill-advised as the above methods preserve history, formatting, etc. Please also review for CopyVio as I see the draft has been tagged as having an issueSlywriter (talk) 22:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at actual text, the full manifesto should not be in the article and the signatories section is questionable. I would not move into mainspace without giving article a hard look and would suggest submitting to AfC as I'm not sure mainspace is a slamdunkSlywriter (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helpEngmaj (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]