Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 June 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 6 << May | June | Jul >> June 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 7

[edit]

00:48:57, 7 June 2022 review of draft by Sebastiandelfi

[edit]


Hi there, I would like guidance on my article Sebastian Delfi I’m unsure of what part needs to be changed as I have made a lot of references. Much appreciated.

Sebastiandelfi (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastiandelfi If you are not Sebastian Delfi, you will need to change your username at Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS. You cannot use his name as your username unless you are him. See the notability guidance for boxers and tell us how this person meets some aspect of them. 331dot (talk) 06:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've made adjustments as requested. Thank you for the guidance. Apollosouthpaw (talk) 11:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:12:07, 7 June 2022 review of draft by 174.88.30.132

[edit]


Am I ready to go with these sources? 174.88.30.132 (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@174.88.30.132: I made some minor improvements and it looks good to go. It should be accepted as soon as someone gets to it. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:02:55, 7 June 2022 review of submission by Lognetics

[edit]


Lognetics (talk) 15:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lognetics: You don't ask a question, but your article is poorly sourced. Remove everything that doesn't come from an independent source, and if there's not enough left for an article, then the subject doesn't meet our requirements for notability. See WP:GNG. I think you'd be better off taking a step back and reading WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:22:46, 7 June 2022 review of submission by Kerrylei14

[edit]

May I ask what would be considered as notable? Kerrylei14 (talk) 16:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kerrylei14 All of the messages on your draft included a link to the notability guidelines, but here it is, WP:N. Furthermore, editing about cryptocurrencies is a contentious area and has its own special rules, because of continuing disruption and flooding of crypto edits. I will inform you of these special rules on your user talk page. If this is your company, you must also read WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:20:41, 7 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by AfterBlack

[edit]


Hello, I have made two submissions for my first wikipedia article which has unfortunately been declined. I would appreciate your assistance in learning article writing. Thank you


AfterBlack (talk) 18:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AfterBlack: The draft as written is unsalvageably promotional; I am going to tag it for deletion as such. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:42:12, 7 June 2022 review of submission by DiploCult

[edit]


I have previously submitted without proper disclosures and have resubmitted the draft with all previous comments taken into account. I've been suggested to post here because of this history connected to the article. Could you please take a look and let me know if there are any remaining concerns?

DiploCult (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DiploCult: you do not need to "post here because of this history connected to the article"; only if you have any questions. As for someone "taking a look", that is what will happen when the draft is reviewed, whenever that may happen. And just to note, because of your COI, you should not be tempted to publish this directly, but must wait for the review process to complete. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]