Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 August 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 19 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 21 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 20

[edit]

03:41:59, 20 August 2022 review of submission by Marvel 19

[edit]


Marvel 19 (talk) 03:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Marvel 19 you don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:07:17, 20 August 2022 review of submission by 39.60.120.173

[edit]


39.60.120.173 (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:24:43, 20 August 2022 review of submission by Tumusiime Joas

[edit]


i need a review so that the article is safe and i can be encouraged to write more articles Tumusiime Joas (talk) 09:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tumusiime Joas The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to tell about the existence of a business and what it does- it is for summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the business, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable business. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tumusiime Joas the draft has been reviewed, and rejected, meaning it won't be reviewed again. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:35:27, 20 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Sunnyday87

[edit]


I recently submitted my first article and it got declined because it wasn’t written in a encyclopedic format 


Sunnyday87 (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Sunnyday87 -- I've removed a large portion of the draft because it was copied directly from other websites. Please see Wikipedia's policies on copyright (essentially, don't copy from other websites). Many of the references are promotional and don't demonstrate notability. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sunnyday87 You are correct, it was declined for the reason you state. Do you have a question? 71.228.112.175 (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:59:51, 20 August 2022 review of submission by Danieljacomi

[edit]

Hello, i just want to tell more about the person in question and link his youtube channel, so could i get review Danieljacomi (talk) 21:59, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danieljacomi The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell the world about someone, it is a place to summarize what independent reliable sources say about a person, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. If you just want to tell the world about someone, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Danieljacomi Also, there is absolutely no context. "He was the one who introduced the Random Viewer Levels System" ... Introduced that system to what? "where 3 courses are selected at random per group" ... Courses of what? Groups of what? Are we in bitcoin, or virtual reality, or an FPS game, or Pokemon, or 3D chess, or an MMORPG, or DOTA, or what? The draft doesn't say. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]