Help desk
< September 27	<< Aug \| September \| Oct >>	September 29 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

September 28

01:28:20, 28 September 2021 review of draft by J5320219

J5320219 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Vincent Mattera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I can't really understand the reason not being accepted. It says "the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article". Should I add something else in the article? J5320219 (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J5320219, Draft:Vincent Mattera says (after markup-stripping): This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Which three of the (of course published, reliable, and secondary) sources show significant coverage? Specify them below. As for your other draft, in this edit you had your little fun with comments made by Theroadislong. This edit of yours was silly, childish and disruptive, and if you continue to make such edits you will be prevented from making any edits at all. -- Hoary (talk) 04:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoary, noticing this, I think it's enough already. I've blocked the user per WP:NOTHERE. Undeclared WP:PAID also seems likely. Bishonen | tålk 05:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

08:58:31, 28 September 2021 review of draft by Mtmh2

Mtmh2 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Murni Teguh Hospitals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am not affiliated to the hospital and I provided several links to news media that is certainly not paid for the article. Please advice me so my wikipedia project can be published.

Mtmh2 (talk) 08:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mtmh2 I'm curious as to how you came to edit about this hospital company. In any event, a Wikipedia article must do more than tell of the existence of a company and what it does. It must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Press releases, the company website, brief mentions, announcments of routine business activities, and other primary sources do not establish notability. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 10:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:52:03, 28 September 2021 review of submission by Amandawil

Amandawil (talk · contribs)

Hi! My draft has been rejected on the following grounds:

"This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability."

The reviewer has left the following comment: "Please discuss whether this is a actual term at the WikiProjects"

Can anyone please help me identify if "dose effect" is an actual term or not? Also, I would appreciate it if someone could help me with improving my referencing. Thanks a lot! Amandawil (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amandawil (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Claims implicating human health and healthcare are held to a much higher standard than practically all other content on Wikipedia, and one could very credibly make the case this article would need to heed that higher standard. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 16:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:48:34, 28 September 2021 review of submission by Laurensagebrowning

Laurensagebrowning (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Marissa Chibás (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Laurensagebrowning (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my draft of Marissa Chibás was not accepted and I got a note of COI, but I do not think that applies. Could I recieve help in specifics of my post that read like endorsements as I believe it is all factual. Thanks.

Laurensagebrowning How did you come to write about Marissa? As noted by the reviewer, you need to summarize independent reliable sources that are completely unconnected with her. 331dot (talk) 19:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:19:10, 28 September 2021 review of submission by Noahpdoty

Noahpdoty (talk · contribs)

Hi, I submitted this draft and it was denied, and I made the requested revisions. I was hoping I could get someone to take another look at it and give me some feedback (or just accept it). Thanks! Noahpdoty (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:43:39, 28 September 2021 review of submission by Dixiebella

Dixiebella (talk · contribs)

My submission was rejected as "contrary to the purpose" of Wikipedia. What does that mean? How can I correct the submission. I'm new at this. Dixiebella (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dixiebella The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is just an essay, without sources. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please see Your first article. Be advised that successfully creating a new article is the absolute hardest task to perform on Wikipedia. I might suggest using the new user tutorial, and spending time editing existing articles first, to get a feel for how Wikipedia operates and what is expected of article content. 331dot (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:48:59, 28 September 2021 review of draft by 2A00:23C5:9F0E:6200:5CDA:FBAA:4299:2746

2A00:23C5:9F0E:6200:5CDA:FBAA:4299:2746 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Krishnalal Bysack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please get this article reviewed by who can read Bengali - else they will not be able to understand the references and this is why it is getting rejected. 2A00:23C5:9F0E:6200:5CDA:FBAA:4299:2746 (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely doubt that is why the draft is being declined. It's more that you're citing our sister project Wikisource; we generally don't accept cites to Wikisource any more than we accept cites to Wikipedia. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 22:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:04:06, 28 September 2021 review of submission by Dixiebella

Dixiebella (talk · contribs)
- User:Dixiebella/sandbox/MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST - THE BEGINNING (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added to source for this page. Dixiebella (talk) 22:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the draft was rejected, it will not be considered further. Please read my comment above; we need multiple independent reliable sources to summarize, not just one. If you have additional comments, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]