Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 November 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 20 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 22 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 21

[edit]

04:41:03, 21 November 2021 review of submission by Vacciniumrecord

[edit]

My article got rejected, and I would like to know what changes I can make to get it approved. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Vacciniumrecord (talk) 04:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vacciniumrecord: Please see WP:BIO1E. Also, it appears the sources are largely interviews which cannot be used to establish notability because they are not independent. You may also find this essay about YouTubers and notability helpful. The number of views and/or subscribers is meaningless. S0091 (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:52:24, 21 November 2021 review of submission by Yeomanplot

[edit]

Because this creator has become more relevant since the submission was denied and there are other articles of YouTubers/political commentators less relevant than him. Yeomanplot (talk) 04:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use the presence, absence, or condition of other articles to argue for yours.A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 05:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:39:35, 21 November 2021 review of draft by Joeblow8567

[edit]


Joeblow8567 (talk) 07:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with references thanks you all are on the page if you hit edit need someone better at scripting than I.

Hi @Joeblow8567:, no offense but the draft is a mess and needs to be rewritten. I left you some additional information on your talk page about how to create an article but you may also find this guide for adding citations helpful. However, before you spend the time please read the notability criteria for authors. If he does not meet the criteria, then no amount editing will help. S0091 (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:48:53, 21 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Rtmf

[edit]



Rtmf (talk) 11:48, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An "article" that is nothing more than a YouTube video and a single, vague, unsourced sentence is useless. See WP:Notability and WP:Reliable sources. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 14:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:37:49, 21 November 2021 review of submission by A cute wikipedian

[edit]

Please request re-reviewA cute wikipedian (talk) 12:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:06:13, 21 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Avi Sindhu

[edit]


Hello there, we are first-timers, and we wrote about the Inner Space Network. Soon after we submitted the page to be reviewed, it got regected. We wrote everything to the best of our ability. We are not exactly sure why our submission was rejected and if you could give advice on how to improve it, we would be very grateful. Thank you. Avi Sindhu (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avi Sindhu (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hey! The article I wrote was declined. Can someone tell me why?Avi Sindhu (talk) 13:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avi Sindhu It was rejected, not just declined, which means it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about something, but a place to summarize what independent reliable sources say about a topic. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Who is "we"? Each account is for the exclusive use of a single individual. If you represent the subject, please review conflict of interest. For replies, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 14:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:43:08, 21 November 2021 review of draft by مالڪ سولنڪي

[edit]


مالڪ سولنڪي (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:44:07, 21 November 2021 review of draft by مالڪ سولنڪي

[edit]


مالڪ سولنڪي (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:07:55, 21 November 2021 review of submission by ZX2006XZ

[edit]


ZX2006XZ (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


How can I make this article notable?

ZX2006XZ You cannot "make" it notable, as no amount of editing can confer notability. You will have to wait until the film is released. 331dot (talk) 20:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:30:47, 21 November 2021 review of submission by Pinksimplelight

[edit]


Pinksimplelight (talk) 20:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinksimplelight You don't ask a question, but Wikipedia is not social media. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:27:24, 21 November 2021 review of submission by Mitchellfrieder

[edit]

Hello, I am writing my first article for Wikipedia about artist Andrew Frieder and entered it into my Sandbox. The reviewer has twice told me, after one round of revisions, that I need to add context, but will give me no further explanation or detail. I am hoping that someone can set me on the right path towards understanding what is required.

Thank you,

MitchellMitchellfrieder (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Mitchellfrieder (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mitchellfrieder: your sandbox only has a name. Are you trying to write an article or just practicing? If you are practicing, there is no need to submit your sandbox for review. If you are intending to write an article, please read Your first article. If you are related to or affiliated with Andrew Frieder, then you need to declare your conflict of interest and also follow those guidelines. I will post some additional information on your talk page. S0091 (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]