Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 13 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 14

[edit]

03:34:49, 14 January 2021 review of draft by TechJourno

[edit]


Hi. I created a stub for “Synnex Technology International Corporation” a couple of months back, and it’s been rejected. I’m new to Wikipedia and I’m having trouble understanding what I’ve done wrong. When I look at the draft there’s a reference to WP:NCOMPANY, which I think means that the company isn’t significant … even though it’s listed on the stock exchange? There’s also a note that says that the submission is blank? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated!

TechJourno (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TechJourno. In Articles for creation parlance, the draft has been declined (which allows improvement and re-submission), not rejected (which is final, not allowing re-submission). Being listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange is encouraging, but, according to the WP:LISTED section of WP:NCOMPANY, is not sufficient on its own to demonstrate notability. The draft needs several independent, reliable sources that are deeper than a listing, passing mention, or routine news. Simplywall.st doesn't have the necessary reputation for accuracy and fact checking to make it a reliable source, but that is the depth of coverage to look for - only in quality media like The South China Morning Post, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Wall Street Journal, etc. Wikipedia already has several possibly-related poor quality articles: MiTAC, MiTAC Holdings, and MiTAC Computing Technology Corp.. You might find it easier, and more beneficial to the encyclopedia, to improve an existing article than to start a new one from scratch. The relationships among the various companies certainly needs clarification. Even if they are separate legal entities, that may not mean they are best treated in separate stand alone articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:59:39, 14 January 2021 review of draft by Aslan110

[edit]


Hi,

I created a submission that's been declined on Jan.4 by user Curbon7 - I've asked him to give me more details on his talk page but he's not responded so far, which is why I'm seeking more advice here

I'd just like to understand why it's not admissible

1. The page is a translation from the french wikipedia, where it already exists (I also wrote the french version). Is it possible that one page is admissible in & language and not admissible in another ? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C3%ABl_P%C3%A9neau

2. Some of The criterias for music composers/performers (according to the guidelines) seem to apply :

- criteria #4 : Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country

- criteria #10 : Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.

- criteria #1 : Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

Could you please let me know as to why these criterias are not sufficient ?

Also, I found a number of similar pages related to techno producers and DJs (some with less relevant sources than the ones I used for this page) so I'm wondering why these pages have been deemed admissible but not the one I've submitted : - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Silent_Servant - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_Hacker - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/DVS1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aslan110 (talkcontribs) 08:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks,


Aslan110 (talk) 07:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:51:41, 14 January 2021 review of draft by SztolpenOS

[edit]


Hello, I'd like to ask you for some tips while writing an article about the company [Sunreef Yachts]. First draft was declined and I've already corrected it, but if you have any advise for me how I can improve the text I'll be grateful for that.

Additionally, how long does it take to submit the corrected article again? How many times I can correct the article? Many thanks!

SztolpenOS (talk) 08:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:50, 14 January 2021 review of submission by Francisjk2020

[edit]

Please take a look at the revised draft. Need changes have been made, sources and citations added. All the faults points out by the reviewers have been corrrected. (Francisjk2020 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)) Francisjk2020 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:19:38, 14 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Artemenkov

[edit]


Dear Wikipedia Editors, I was meaning to write a bio article for Russian Wikipedia, but in my inexperience ended submitting it to English Wikipedia, as I didn't know that the firm barriers between the two Wikipedia's exist. So it was declined for English Wikepedia and I was suggested by the editor to transfer it to the Russian Wikipedia , but I don't know how to effect this transfer, what shall I do to transfer my page with the code into the Russian Wikipedia? Thanks for assisting me!

Artemenkov (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Artemenkov: is 109.248.220.245 also you? Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:36:51, 14 January 2021 review of submission by Darzubair

[edit]

This personal is the notable football coach of All india football Federation (AIFF) and is a Professional licensed coach under Asian football federation. Help me in getting this page verified

Darzubair (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:51:48, 14 January 2021 review of submission by Nboni1

[edit]

I have update this page with links and images to highlight the relevance to the wider wikipedia community as a star of a national TV show i believe that Liv Burt should have a page. Nboni1 (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help me get this published ? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Chef_Liv_Burt Nboni1 (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nboni1 The draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. The person does not meet the notability criteria. 331dot (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:14:52, 14 January 2021 review of submission by KentuckyGeneral2000

[edit]


KentuckyGeneral2000 (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KentuckyGeneral2000 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 18:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:00:56, 14 January 2021 review of submission by 103.211.52.64

[edit]


103.211.52.64 (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


21:34:49, 14 January 2021 review of submission by DavidPlayzYT

[edit]

This movie is not publicly famous, but I do think any movie should have a wikipedia page. DavidPlayzYT (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidPlayzYT: no. Any movie shouldn't have a wikipedia page if they aren't covered significantly by published, reliable, independent media. Thank you! :) MarioJump83! 02:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:24:53, 14 January 2021 review of submission by LinneaReilly

[edit]


I took out all the sales copy. I wrote a DREXSPORT article (in review https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Drexsport), and Wild Muscle and Wild Whey are DREXSPORT products. I simply identified them as DREXSORT protein supplements. LinneaReilly (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


22:25:47, 14 January 2021 review of draft by Austinkocher

[edit]


I am attempting to submit a new page for an educational research institution here (Draft:Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC)). However, the page has been rejected twice for the reason that it does not have sufficient independent resources showing relevance. I don't understand how to correct this since I have included 20 references so far to TRAC being used by national outlets ranging from the New York Times to Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. What am I missing? I would greatly appreciate any clarification you can provide.

Austinkocher (talk) 22:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already answered at the Teahouse. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:33:11, 14 January 2021 review of draft by EditorCTD

[edit]


I am trying to publish a Wikipedia page for Country Travel Discoveries the company that I work for. It has not been accepted and I need help editing it so it will be accepted. EditorCTD (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]