Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 December 16
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < December 15 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 17 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 16
[edit]06:43:22, 16 December 2021 review of submission by Generic son of the Sun
[edit]The draft I submitted for this page was rejected. My issue is I actually only need to publish a translation for the main page of this society which is in Persian. And this is a translation for that one. So how shall I give a reference? Is referring to the main page in Persian enough? Or shall I refer to the website of the Society? There is no English version on the website either.
Generic son of the Sun (talk) 06:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Generic son of the Sun: I presume you mean this is a translation from the Persian/Farsi Wikipedia? (If you mean it's a translation from the organisation's webpage, we can't accept it because content from an organisation's website is almost never suitable for Wikipedia.) Even if it's just a straight translation the result must still adhere to en.wp's policies, and the English-language Wikipedia has some of the strictest sourcing policies around. Translation or no, you will need to provide in-depth sources that are independent of the subject/their surrogates and have competent editorial oversight that fact-checks, discloses, and retracts as necessary. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 07:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
14:45:49, 16 December 2021 review of submission by 175.142.191.211
[edit]I just want to create "Starscixn" article but when I create, why you declined my article?. 175.142.191.211 (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- As noted, the musician you wrote about is not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone. An article about a musician must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the musician, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. Your draft just tells that the person exists and sources it to the availability of their music. That is insufficient to establish notability, as almost anyone can post music online. Please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
17:45:40, 16 December 2021 review of draft by 80.1.217.168
[edit]- 80.1.217.168 (talk · contribs)
My article has been rejected because of inadequate referencing of sources. Yet there are 23 in all. Can you advise me on (a) what is wrong with any of the reference's i.e how they can be improved, (b) where in the text references are needed but not yet present?
80.1.217.168 (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @80.1.217.1.168: As i stated in the comments, several sections lack citations. Without citations, its impossible to tell if the material is supported by the numerous references.
- Look at definitions section, is that your own description or is that what sources say is the definition? Same for 2nd half of Origins and all of adaptations and half of comparisons sectionsSlywriter (talk) 17:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
20:03:43, 16 December 2021 review of submission by JackDaniel2022
[edit]My first attempt to create a new Wiki page was denied due to a lack of sourcing. I have since added quite a bit more and there are hundreds more articles about this brand to choose from. I just want to be sure I am on the right track as I continue to build the page. Thank you! JackDaniel2022 (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- You're on completely the wrong track, sorry. There is literally nothing salvageable here; you'll have to start from scratch (assuming your sources are good, which I haven't checked). DS (talk) 20:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- JackDaniel2022, to be more specific, the page reads like ad copy, not an encyclopedic article. "mindfully cultivates", "proudly held", "this sacred plant" are some of the worst offenders, but the entire page is heavily slanted. If you're associated with the company, take a look at WP:COIE; otherwise you'll need to to rewrite the page by stating just the straightforward facts about the organization with no flowery language. Rusalkii (talk) 21:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
20:07:11, 16 December 2021 review of draft by ThinkerCastillo
[edit]
Hello, Could you please review the new draft after the suggested edits?
ThinkerCastillo (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately there's a backlog right now, so it might take a while before someone gets to your draft. Rusalkii (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
23:24:41, 16 December 2021 review of submission by 94.14.61.78
[edit]- 94.14.61.78 (talk · contribs)
Please review this wiki page as this is page is for a bollywood actress and her name is Aartii Naagpal also ive added loads of references. 94.14.61.78 (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, as it appears that she does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable actress or a notable person. 331dot (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)