Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 25
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 24 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 26 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 25
[edit]06:36:27, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre
[edit]- Chirag-Behre (talk · contribs)
Hello Team,
I have made some changes in the draft by adding some strong reliable source of the referenced articles. I request the team to kindly go through the attached draft and let me know if anything else is required.
Chirag-Behre (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Chirag-Behre. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. You may wish to explore alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:51, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
06:52:49, 25 September 2019 review of submission by 27.60.163.180
[edit]
Hello, the press coverage received are of notable references. Could you guide us on what are the benchmarks for notability?
27.60.163.180 (talk) 06:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- @27.60.163.180: - hi there, for a company to be notable it needs to meet these criteria. The first source is just a very basic summary that doesn't cover the company in depth. The second source is about Grover, not the company, and is mainly quotes from various individuals so it's not neutral/independent. Almost all of your final source is quotes or indirect quotes by Wadhwani, with relatively little told about the company by a neutral party. You need multiple in-depth sources that are from reliable secondary sources and independent (which rules out most interviews). Nosebagbear (talk) 10:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
11:19:07, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Indigenus~enwiki
[edit]Hello, this is my second post on the Help Desk, hope it get answered this time. I was advised that the multiple references for the draft article do not meet the criteria for notability. This is quite confusing, as the following references are multiple, and apparently meet the defined criteria for significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources. Please see below:
1. Coverage in BloombergQuint.com, a prominent financial news portal formed as partnership between Bloomberg and Quintillion media (reference: https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/bloomberg-forms-new-partnership-with-quintillion-media-in-india/). Coverage link: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/startup-street-this-startup-says-it-can-nearly-wipe-out-your-electricity-bill
2. Coverage in ETEnergyworld.com, a part of The Economic Times, India's largest English financial daily, that focuses on energy news. Coverage link: https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/we-will-achieve-rs-100-cr-annual-revenue-this-financial-year-pranesh-chaudhary-founder-zunroof/70024921
3. Coverage in The Hindu Businessline, a leading, highly-credible financial daily in India. Coverage link: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/specials/clean-tech/lighting-up-your-home-right-from-the-roof/article27198508.ece
4. Coverage in CNBC-TV18, a leading financial news channel (an India-specific venture of CNBC), link: https://www.cnbctv18.com/young-turks/young-turks-troubled-with-high-electricity-bills-heres-how-zunroof-can-solve-your-problems-3828671.htm
5. Coverage in Moneycontrol.com, a prominent financial and business news portal owned by Network 18, a leading media company of India. Link: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/this-startups-solar-power-solutions-is-making-indian-homes-green-and-future-ready-3971841.html
I feel that Zunroof meets the criteria for notability - however I am happy to take feedback from other editors.
Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
12:41:24, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Mari Wiki SB
[edit]- Mari Wiki SB (talk · contribs)
Hello:
I don't understand why my article was rejected. All of the content comes from the company's website, which is listed as an external link. Please tell me what I should be doing in order to get this article finally published! I am an agency representing this company (Jewish Museum of Basel).
Thanks!
Mari Wiki SB (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Mari Wiki SB: First, post the mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mari Wiki SB. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:
{{paid|user=Mari Wiki SB|employer=agency name|client=Jewish Museum of Basel}}. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Mari Wiki SB: Thank you for placing the disclosure. You are supposed to replace the "agency name" bit in the template with the name of the agency you are working for, e.g. "Fitz & Co.", or whatever.
- You've added citations to some independent sources, so you may resubmit the draft (there is now a big blue "Resubmit" button within the large pink box at the top of Draft:Jewish Musem of Switzerland). --Worldbruce (talk) 14:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
12:56:29, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Manishsinghon
[edit]
Manishsinghon (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
12:58:41, 25 September 2019 review of submission by Manishsinghon
[edit]
Manishsinghon (talk) 12:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi I have shared the links of reliable and noteworthy sources. Now I can believe the article can be published.
Originally I started work on record labels of New Jersey focusing first on Command Records and Mint 400 Records with plans for working on other labels. My draft was denied, this was my response:
I'm requesting assistance because I am joining Wikipedia to focus on record labels in Northern New Jersey because I lived there in the 1990's. Most of the labels I wanted to focus on have already in depth Wikipedia pages some of which I am still compiling information to add to. Two labels I wanted to focus on that had very little about them was the 60's label Command Records which I have added to and the record label Mint 400 Records which is currently one of the biggest record labels in North New Jersey. It was stated they don't have enough substantial resources about them or not reputable resources? I don't quite know how to substantiate that the label has been a staple of Northern NJ for over a decade with over 250 releases and about 100 bands signed. They seemed to have been written about by every major music writer in Northern NJ, so I'm not sure what Wikipedia needs in order to approve the page.
Other labels I would like to write about in this area include: Little Dickman Records, Rhyme & Reason Records, Pyrrhic Victory Recordings, Dromedary Records and Killing Horse Records. I'm not quite sure how to substantiate their existences either to write about them. They all exist and they are very well respected and well known in the North East USA. Is this something that just is not going to be able to be on Wikipedia?
This was then the response: References are either to unreliable sources, or only mention the subject in passing. Lacking the in-depth coverage required by corporation guidelines.
However, it seems that a bunch of notable New Jersey press members like Bob Makin, Jim Testa, Gary Wein, and others who had accredited press and their own pages were all removed from Wikipedia. It's as if someone purposely is deleting much of the people, writers, bands, musicians, and information which was on Wikipedia to use it as ammo to basically erase a subsection of that states music community. Also mentioned was that the label was only mentioned in passing, which I investigated and saw that most if not all labels were represented in the press this way, there tends not to be articles written on the label but the content they provide and it's effect. If that is that case then that is fine, but I noticed for other states that their music community is represented if it was notable in the same way. Can I get a definitive answer on if the topics are too small?