Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 October 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 21 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 23 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 22

[edit]

01:21:41, 22 October 2019 review of draft by SilviaTRE388

[edit]


Any help would be appreciated with my article on Laura Liguori. I added more references and am trying to make it less promotional. Please feel free to make any changes or cut or change anything. I appreciate it. I know you all are very busy, and I appreciate your time and help.

SilviaTRE388 (talk) 01:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:31, 22 October 2019 review of submission by Tapoleon

[edit]


Tapoleon (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tapoleon,
For a company to have a Wikipedia article, it needs to meet WP:42 - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic.
At the moment your article doesn't have this, and a quick search suggests it is unlikely to have it.
This is required so content can be verified - we can't just take the company's word for it. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 13:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, articles about blockchain and cryptocurrencies are under general sanctions by Wikipedia. Bkissin (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:38:21, 22 October 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by JasonVoorheesNaughty

[edit]



JasonVoorheesNaughty (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JasonVoorheesNaughty, this is probably not the place for requesting undeletion. You should ask at WP:REFUND, where admins that regularly deal with undeletion can look at it. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 13:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, please don't go there. Your draft was deleted under criterion G11, i.e. advertisement. Advertisements are not generally undeleted, especially as it seems it was an autobiography, which are also strongly discouraged. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 13:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please Undelete

15:35:24, 22 October 2019 review of submission by Xeleos28

[edit]


The entry has been changed immensely to better fall in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. If rejection is again warranted, please offer constructive advice to help aid in a future revision. Thank you!

[[User:|Xeleos28]] (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xeleos28. The cited sources are as craptastic as ever. If the draft were reviewed again, it would be rejected again and possibly deleted. The good news is that rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the subject is not notable. So you don't have to waste your time revising it, because volunteers do not intend to review it again.
Writing new encyclopedia articles is one of the most difficult tasks a novice editor can undertake. My advice is not to try to write ones about companies that are still in business until you have much more experience as a Wikipedian. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:36:22, 22 October 2019 review of submission by Joshathilton

[edit]


I need to add a logo to this page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Motto_by_Hilton, but I don't understand all the options or attribution. I did not personally create the logo, but you can see that it's the official logo for this brand here: https://www.hilton.com/en/motto/

Joshathilton (talk) 15:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While technically you shouldn't be editing the page as you have a blatant conflict of interest and are paid by Hilton, the information around logos can be found here: Wikipedia:Logos Bkissin (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:31:10, 22 October 2019 review of submission by Akanksa

[edit]


Akanksa (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Akanksa, For any subject to have a Wikipedia article, they must meet WP:42 - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic.
We can't have any articles that don't meet this, as it would be impossible to verify the contents. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 18:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]