Help desk
< November 16	<< Oct \| November \| Dec >>	November 18 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

November 17

Request by Wowletmebe

Draft:Egbunike (surname)

Please confirm if this article needs any additional information. Also can you please submit this for a review if this is fine.

Wowletmebe (talk) 00:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason my request for revuew is being ignored? Please assist

Wowletmebe (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wowletmebe: - I've submitted on your behalf. It looks okay, but I can't do reviews on this laptop. For future note, give it 36 hours before following up - Sunday in particular is the quietest day on Wikipedia Nosebagbear (talk) 14:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help, appreciated.

Wowletmebe (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:05:39, 17 November 2019 review of submission by Callyhannah

Callyhannah (talk · contribs)

This keeps getting rejected. Hazel has just won the Adelaide 3 star for the 3rd time. She is one of 5 riders in the world to win an international olympic level event 3 times. Can someone please help me.

Callyhannah (talk) 07:05, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:40:34, 17 November 2019 review of submission by Bobbyshann

Bobbyshann (talk · contribs)
- User:Bobbyshann/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi There I Just update the page with more details. Please review for approve. Thank you Bobbyshann (talk) 09:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bobbyshann, The article seems to be about an average person, like you or I, and thus no particular reason to have an article. The sources aren't properly formatted or used in the first place (see referencing for beginners), and most of them aren't reliable (such as blogs). Furthermore, the tone was promotional, and seems to have original research, which we do not allow. Because it is not notable, it will likely be deleted. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:09:45, 17 November 2019 review of submission by One Red Line

One Red Line (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Choo Yilin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Would appreciate some feedback on the page above. Previous submission was rejected because it sounded like a marketing/advertising spiel, which is not the intention. Have rewritten, but would appreciate if someone with more experience could look it over. Thanks! One Red Line (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:44:47, 17 November 2019 review of draft by Brettler555

Brettler555 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Clay Smith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

It is the opinion of this author that the edited draft complies with the standards of merit for this individual to have inclusion. What more can I do to conform. Or else, shall I add submit to the top of the work. Thank you for your indulgence.

Brettler555 (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brettler555, Your references are very malformed. Please read referencing for beginners to see how to fix things. From what I can tell, your main issue is that your "ref" tags aren't closed. I.e. you open them, using <ref>. But then you don't close them using a ref with a slash, such as </ref>.That is not the only issue. The sources are not all up to snuff. IMDb is not a reliable source and cannot be used. Blogs are not usable as sources either. Additionally, please remove the image boxes, as the images have been deleted. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:25, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:19:03, 17 November 2019 review of draft by JayShah2002

JayShah2002 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Desi Namu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

JayShah2002 (talk) 15:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

when will my article be reviewed JayShah2002 (talk) 15:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)jayShah2002[reply]

JayShah2002, Reviews are averaging 8 weeks at the moment. However, I see you have recieved some feedback on your draft, which you should definitely take. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i did all the requested changes and a kind volunteer or reviewer also helped organise my page now can it be published ? its already been 60 days since my submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JayShah2002 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JayShah2002, A volunteer helped you, but the article needs more work still. More sources, and more text are needed. I could review it, but the current outcome would be to decline the draft and have it sent back for more work. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:51:00, 17 November 2019 review of submission by Davisbro3812712

Davisbro3812712 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lukas Liming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have changed the feel of the page - could you please take a look into this. Help me add some stuff - so it doesn't make me look like a fan. I mean I listen to his songs - but not really a fan.

Davisbro3812712 (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the draft has been deleted, or does not exist, and thus we cannot help you. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]