Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 September 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 12 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 14 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 13

[edit]

Request on 01:11:21, 13 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Shibainu21

[edit]


This is for "Switchboard Live" Thanks for reviewing my article. Could I get some assistance about my references? What criteria is fulfilled and what isn't from the references that are currently there? Thank You!

Shibainu21 (talk) 01:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

02:03:08, 13 September 2018 review of draft by Thegooduser

[edit]


Will my article be accepted? Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How could it be accepted? There are no notability references. All of your references are to the publication itself or its publisher. Some independent coverage is required to establish WP:notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

04:28:55, 13 September 2018 review of draft by Harwn733

[edit]


Is this the only way to get some attention around here? It said it could take days monthes even at afc. Harwn733 (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Harwn733 (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC) http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joseph-okumu/profil/spieler/453376 Harwn733 (talk) 04:36, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harwn733 see the message posted to the draft by the reviewer. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

05:41:25, 13 September 2018 review of draft by Musicant.oren

[edit]


My contribution “Edna Schechtman” is waiting very long time (>2 months) for the review process. How can we promote the review process? Musicant.oren (talk) 05:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've improved the layout, formatting, added wikilinks and a few other minor fixes, but you've got some way to go to demonstrate her notability. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:50:32, 13 September 2018 review of submission by 114.240.224.165

[edit]


114.240.224.165 (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Please I have written this article for to be submitted for publication. Please is there a breach. I need your help .[reply]

17:19:52, 13 September 2018 review of draft by 38.142.24.194

[edit]


This draft is supposed to be a disambiguation page because there are two meanings of "phlashing," one related to phishing and one related to a denial-of-service attack. Both of these meanings are sourced on the pages I mentioned. However, "phlashing" currently redirects only to to the "denial-of-service attack" article. If the disambiguation page is accepted, how will that affect the redirect? Is there a way to remove the redirect? 38.142.24.194 (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC) 38.142.24.194 (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:52:24, 13 September 2018 review of draft by 68.103.78.155

[edit]


What's Taking So Long It Needs to move into article space now. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have no deadlines here and in any case the draft violates the WP:NOTGUIDE rule. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]