Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 December 11
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< December 10 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 12 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 11
[edit]01:21:09, 11 December 2018 review of draft by 68.103.78.155
[edit]
The Template I Made was the 2019 American Athletic Conference football standings template was not responding. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
68.103.78.155 (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
05:11:12, 11 December 2018 review of draft by Abskiee
[edit]- [[User:abskiee
Abskiee|abskiee Abskiee]] ([[User talk:abskiee Abskiee|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/abskiee Abskiee|contribs]])
When i saw the other articles like about indie films they are the simplest article that i saw but when i created an article like them they always request to delete it i know im not a good writer,blogger or something but i like when i do article's because i feel like i have a contribution in the Wikipedia and in the world Please save my article :(
Abskiee (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
06:14:43, 11 December 2018 review of submission by Shivkarandholiya12
[edit]
Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 06:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
06:55:41, 11 December 2018 review of draft by Marcelju
[edit]
The "further notes" has all the announcements of the awards to rely on (rather than ref's to the content).
This is enough evidence.
I have direct connection to the committee that have worked on this award for years.
Marcelju (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
07:23:53, 11 December 2018 review of submission by TIEMSOMAN
[edit]
Tiemsoman1 (talk) 07:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
08:01:03, 11 December 2018 review of submission by Technical .k
[edit]- Technical .k (talk · contribs)
Technical .k (talk) 08:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
08:01:19, 11 December 2018 review of submission by Technical .k
[edit]- Technical .k (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Technical .k (talk) 08:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
09:43:58, 11 December 2018 review of submission by MrMohammedJanjua
[edit]
MrMohammedJanjua (talk) 09:43, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
10:49:04, 11 December 2018 review of draft by Acolombohm
[edit]- Acolombohm (talk · contribs)
Hi there, I have just published an article from Sandbox instead of Drafts, I wanted to ask if that will create problems with approval? Also, how will the title of the article be decided as it has my user name from Sandbox? Thank you Acolombohm (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Acolombohm (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Acolombohm The draft was moved to Draft:Home Made. When the only references available are about a young company raising funding, you can be sure that it's a non-notable topic that shouldn't have an article in Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
12:31:20, 11 December 2018 review of draft by User:Robert_McClenon
[edit]Hi Team I have created an article for review but has been declined and a bit scare to resubmit it as I am new to the wikipedia can some give some hint as what I need to do
Warsamedhuje (talk) 12:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Don't be scared to resubmit. What do you specifically want help on? Legacypac (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
21:48:28, 11 December 2018 review of submission by PRCaseStudies
[edit]
Thank you for reviewing the draft article "CVS_Quits_Tobacco." The draft got rejected for "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Appears to be a simple advert for a Pharmacy range in the US. Might merit a single sentence inclusion in CVS Pharmacy but not an article. Pure promotion". I would like to introduce myself, I am a student at CSULB and my team and I are working on a this Wikipedia article to educated students on this Public Relations Case Study. I would like to make it clear that our intention is to not to pose "Pure Promotion". We believe from a neutral standpoint and we are determined to work with the Wikipedia team in establishing a professional and acceptable article. Can you please help us in achieving this goal.
If there are any areas that need to be to changes, please let us know. We will be more than willing to edit the article for it to be approved.
Thank you and just want to remind you that this article is for educational purpose only.
-Joe Velasquez PRCaseStudies (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- User blocked as a shared account and promotional edits. Legacypac (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)