Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 April 9
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < April 8 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 10 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
April 9
[edit]07:17:12, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Carlosmoreira69
[edit]
Carlos Moreira 07:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
07:17:28, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Carlosmoreira69
[edit]- Carlosmoreira69 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Carlos Moreira 07:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosmoreira69 (talk • contribs)
I did thank you for your input, im still trying to find more sources on this one, it is quite as old drum machine so i am stuggling a bitIjustwannabeawinner (talk) 08:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Ijustwannabeawinner: did you read the comments in the big Pink box at top of your draft? Do you have follow-up questions? MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
08:35:56, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Ics7836
[edit]
Ics7836 (talk) 08:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ics7836 - Looks like the draft you were creating was deleted for unambiguous advertising. You can't use promotional language, or use wikipedia to promote a company, product or otherwise. See WP:NPOV. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
09:44:45, 9 April 2018 review of submission by 139.47.30.125
[edit]
Hi there. I've applied the requested modification to my article after it was initially declined. My article is now awaiting re-review since early February, so I was wondering if you can give me an estimate on when it will be re-reviewed and/or if there is any action I could take to speed up the process. Thanks a lot!
139.47.30.125 (talk) 09:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- It was accepted earlier today. I have fixed a few minor issues and added a maintenance tag to request improved referencing. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I've added citations of reliable sources for verification, as per request in maintenance tag. May I ask what is the procedure to remove such tag? Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panznet (talk • contribs) 08:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
12:04:27, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Davidbavin
[edit]- Davidbavin (talk · contribs)
I have had the above article declined on grounds of it reading too much like an advert rather than an encyclopaedia entry. I understand and accept this point, but I wanted to ask if there were anymore tips on how I could ensure that the article is more likely to pass. Are there any sectors in particular that need working on or removing entirely?
Many thanks,
Davidbavin (talk) 12:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Davidbavin - I removed what I considered the advertising (The article still needs some cleanup for tone, and such), and added an infobox, before going ahead and accepting the article. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi LeeVilenski, thanks very much for accepting. Any suggestions for tone clean up please just let me know. thanks
15:24:24, 9 April 2018 review of submission by Chrisdevelop
[edit]- Chrisdevelop (talk · contribs)
Draft:Derek Williams (musician)
The Discogs copyright issue arose because I supplied Dr Williams with a draft of my opening introduction for him to verify its accuracy, which he then paraphrased and submitted to Discogs, without realising this would infringe copyright. I am the sole author of the material. Dr Williams has now arranged for this to be removed, so the only copy should now be that on Wikipedia.