Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 August 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 3 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 4

[edit]

13:32:52, 4 August 2017 review of submission by RanjitBimrah

[edit]

I want to request about Ranjit Mangal Singh because our page is fresh and not must be matched with anyone. I'm want to post or show article on Wikipedia. Allow me to add it article while creating same articles in by Wikipedia using Request Article. It's not fake or copy paste instead than its fresh article and have Chairman and Owner of this small business. But Wikipedia doesn't accept my article. Do something as soon as possible. The website is talkapp-messenger.com/about. and more information here in it.

RanjitBimrah (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@RanjitBimrah: Hello, Ranjit. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the delay in response. You make a point of saying the article is not fake, even though nobody had suggested it was fake. But now that you mention it, I am a bit puzzled as to how Singh's facial expression changed not one bit in the six years between the 1982 photo and the 1988 photo. I'm also struggling to understand how a ten-year old boy could have facial hair. But I'm really struggling with the fact that you categorize Singh as a living person while also telling us that he died in 1990. And I'm more than a little surprised to read, in the final sentence, that Singh started his website two years after he died. I am truly interested in hearing your response. NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's not just his facial expression that changed not one bit in the six years, it's even the folds in his turban. If this is fakery, it's remarkably unconvincing. Maproom (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed and (unsurprisingly) declined the draft. Besides the obvious fakery with the photos, the dates make no sense. I'm having a hard time figuring out how the subject could have a Twitter account when he died 16 years before Twitter was founded. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:26, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]