Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 May 16
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < May 15 | << Apr | May | Jun >> | May 17 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
May 16
[edit]01:54:07, 16 May 2015 review of submission by Fairywizard21
[edit]- Fairywizard21 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
fairywizard21 01:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairywizard21 (talk • contribs)
- @Fairywizard21: Hello! Can you explain your question in greater detail here? We'd like to help you if we can, but we need to know what your question is first. Thanks, /wia /talk 10:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Wikiisawesome: So sorry for later reply, didn't get a notification of your response. The draft is here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft_talk:Meg_John_Barker. The reviewers say "The problem with your submission is that it's a biography of a living person, and sexuality related articles can be controversial topics. Therefore the requirements of writing and sourcing are stricter than for other articles, which is why it was pulled back to draft space. From a cursory look through the sources, they don't seem to be directly about Dr. Barker as their prime subject material; I'd personally want to see more sources specifically accrediting her academic qualifications." It sounds like they wanted the focus on sources 'accrediting academic material' whereas I had assumed they were more interested in external sources (news reports etc) that showed Meg John was well known. Do you think they just want links to more of their papers, books, keynote presentations etc? Thanks for your help, Louisa