Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 December 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 18 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 20 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 19

[edit]

02:24:46, 19 December 2015 review of submission by Daniellehakim

[edit]


I believe that my article to create a page for Pat Larter meets the Wikipedia guidelines for a notable person yet continue to be rejected and I think this is discriminatory- Any one which a knowledge of Australian Art and Art History would know of Pat Larter and can see that she was an important figure from the facts I have included and sources I have quoted. She has worldwide recognition too! As wikipedia states the below reasons for notability which if you read my article ARE met.

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

What do I do from here please help! I think more needs to be done to make sure credible people are viewing and assessing the worth of articles...As they clearly do not understand the wikipedia guidelines!

This is my draft page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Pat_Larter Daniellehakim (talk) 02:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniellehakim There simply are not enough in-depth third-party sources overall yet to suggest a solidly notable and acceptable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You have already asked the same question at the Teahouse. You aren't going to get a different question by asking here. Several credible people (including SwisterTwister) have already told you what needs to be done to establish that Pat Larter is notable. Maproom (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:31:36, 19 December 2015 review of submission by Sajelsaxena

[edit]


Sajelsaxena (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what is meant by "promotion of content" in my last draft. I tried to be neutral when I was adding information about my company. I drafted that article after going through several other articles present on WikiPedia and followed their format, yet it didn't get published and was rather deleted.

Please help me with the same — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajelsaxena (talkcontribs) 06:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]