Help desk
< January 22	<< Dec \| January \| Feb >>	January 24 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

January 23

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mario Despoja

I don't know if the reviewer who rejected my submission on Mario Despoja Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mario Despojaactually read through the two references. If he had, he would have seen that all the material which followed my insertion of footnotes 1 and 2 into the text was contained in the articles already referenced.

My approach would have been fine in an academic journal, I believe. How does Wikipedia handle a situation like this?Tundern (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tundern, since Despoja is a WP:Living person we have an ethical (and procedural) obligation to ensure that all stated facts about him are sourceable. If you've already footnoted a source, and you use it later in the article, just footnote it again. There's a way to tidy it up later, but in the meantime it's fine to footnote the same source several times. Do note though, we always want to see a body of coverage on a biography, so if you can add some more citations about him, maybe go on GoogleBooks and find a cite to a published book for additional contrast, that helps show the reader that a variety of works agree on the basic facts of his life. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Tisch

I'm kind of new to Wikipedia. Recently, an article I recently wrote was declined with the reason:

"This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject."

I don't really understand what this means. I want to make it a good article but I don't know how to fix it. Could somebody please give me a little more direction as to how I can improve the article? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cazer78 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the decline reason again you will see that the key terms and phrases are blue links - open those links and you will find pages containing explanations and guidance. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Anscombe

Please can you let me know if my submission is now under review. I've made amends and yet it's not clear on my page. There is a yellow box. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ha0250 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that submission is awaiting review. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/mp3 to wmv files conversion

Sir, I have published the above titled article. But got to know it was rejected. I just want to know what`s wrong in my article. Please reply asap. Tezzsurya (talk) 10:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Tezzsurya[reply]

It was declined for the reasons given in and below the pink box on the page itself. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Muhammad Jahangir

Copy-paste of full article removed

Upon his outstanding business leadership, The Republic of Reunion of Myanmar, appointed him to be the Honorary Consul General of Myanmar in Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitepearl1 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whitepearl1, this is place to ask questions, not post drafts. Do you have an actual question for us? If you want to start a draft, use WP:Article Wizard. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:OuthouseUK/sandbox

Hi,

I would really appreciate some advice with regards to my Wikipedia entry. Could you please give some clarity as to have I achieve Notability, and provide a couple of examples? I have spent a few hours on the chat room and it seems that the page I have created is lacking in non promotional references, however looking at other pages, as an example http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jonathan_Goodwin_(escapologist) , I cannot understand why this has been accepted yet the page I have created has not been accepted.

Your help and guidance would be very much appreciated.

Kindest regards, Rebecca Outhouse-UK — Preceding unsigned comment added by OuthouseUK (talk • contribs) 17:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rebecca. The article on Goodwin is not a recognised Wikipedia Good Article or Featured Article so it's probably not a good example for comparison. You can find the list of recognised Good Articles about comparable people at Wikipedia:Good articles/Media and drama#Actors, models, performers and celebrities and Wikipedia:Good articles/Social sciences and society#Psychology and psychologists. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:37, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review ofWikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Latin Zone Magazine

I wrote this article and can't find the reasons why it was not accepted. Can someone explain? Here's the link Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Latin Zone Magazine Quintrala92 19:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello Quintrala92. Did you read the pink box? Part of the big issues is you haven't demonstrated WP:Notability, summed up at WP:42 as:

Articles require significant coverage

in reliable sources

that are independent of the subject.

Accordingly, just linking to the subject itself (the magazine) does not meet these requirements. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]