Help desk
< December 24	<< Nov \| December \| Jan >>	December 26 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

December 25

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earthworm Heart

Resolved

Hello, reviewers. This article, which I rescued from the G13 deletion queue, was declined for lack of context. It seems to me that it has all of the usual information. It needs some reference formatting, but as far as I understand, that's not a valid decline reason. What's missing context-wise? —Anne Delong (talk) 03:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely nothing. "No context" means "I can't understand what this article is about." It's quite clearly about an album, though they need better sources. Undo the decline as it's incorrect. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 06:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Submission accepted. ~KvnG 18:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

help needed to improve a researcher page

Hello

Since I saw my name cited in several scientific pages of Wikipedia I found it useful to create a personal page on my different scientific contributions in my career. The draft of this page is in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/François_Fages https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fran%C3%A7ois_Fages

I understand the concern about external references and verifiability but I would like to receive confirmation of what causes the problem and what is ok.

For instance, about my initial design of the Ilog-Rules software, I just refer to two wikipedia pages about but I'm not aware of external references about my role, nor of any endorsement procedure, so I could remove that part if it is the problem.

Any help will be appreciated to make precise what exactly is not sufficiently verifiable and should be removed.

All the best to you all for your wonderful effort to make this universal encyclopedia alive !

François Fages (talk) 11:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)François Fages[reply]

We heavily discourage people from writing about themselves as they generally have biases in favour of themselves. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Demigodz

This page has been created and deleted various times over the years and I feel that it has enough credit to still be there. It is now barred from being created so I advise it to be reviewed. GTX-R (talk) 19:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please find the last edit of the Demigodz page here. GTX-R (talk) 19:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Joseph Bublitz

Not sure why the summission has not posted or if it has a potential problem? Please help!

Username: Mastersmen9317 (Redacted)Mastercraftsmen9317 (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you maybe forget to save it, or use a blacklisted link? Also, I redacted your email address; on high-visibility websites posting a email address in a publicly-viewable forum is an invitation to get spammed. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]