Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator/RFA voting criteria
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Voting Criteria
[edit]The WikiProject Administrator RFA !voting criteria asks a !voter to mentally classify the RFA candidate into one of three groups.
Straight Support
[edit]A straight support expresses great confidence in a candidate:
"If I am very certain about a candidate, I may support unilaterally. For these few people, I may know them so well that I will offer them a lifetime "tenure" (unless they commit clear misconduct)."
"Let's see how you do."
[edit]- For most candidates, I simply don't know them well enough to trust them to be admins for life. Many of these candidates do show considerable promise, and I do think they could most likely be great admins-- I just don't have enough data to be sure. So I suggest giving them a trial run, so that we see how they do. In these cases, I may offer to support provided the candidate signs the Wikiproject Administrator Contract, which specifies the conditions under which their adminship will be voided.
- For candidates where I'm unsure and they won't sign the contract, I shall sadly oppose for now. But perhaps at a future RFA I'll know them better.
Straight Oppose
[edit]- For candidates who I don't think can be trusted with the tool, I shall of course oppose.