Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Redeye Sailboat
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/Redeye_Sailboat.jpg/260px-Redeye_Sailboat.jpg)
- Reason
- This is a high EV image.
- Articles this image appears in
- RedEye
Advertising
Sailboat - Creator
- TonyTheTiger
- Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose Redeye is a magazine, how is their logo on a boat even remotely enough EV to justify the requirements of a VPC for any of those articles? — raeky (talk | edits) 00:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Also to add, this is probably a copyright violation of their logo using it here. — raeky (talk | edits) 00:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- As far as the copyright of the logo goes. I dont think it gets any copyright. Its a very simple logo consisting of text and simple geometric shapes. See Template:PD-textlogo for more details. --JovianEye (talk) 03:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's close to the threshold of originality... — raeky (talk | edits) 03:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Even if it does surpass the threshold of originality (which I don't believe it does), it falls under de minimis and is thus not a copyright violation. Juliancolton (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Again I'd say it would be very marginally close to falling under de minimis, but irregardless it holds virtually zero EV in all of it's uses. — raeky (talk | edits) 01:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Even if it does surpass the threshold of originality (which I don't believe it does), it falls under de minimis and is thus not a copyright violation. Juliancolton (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's close to the threshold of originality... — raeky (talk | edits) 03:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - the boat's not at her best, (headsail furled and a reef in the main), so I don't see the EV as being quite there. - Bilby (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough EV for any of these articles. --Elekhh (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose See the all the comments above. --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 16:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted --Jujutacular talk 14:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)