Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Prairie Shores apartments

Prairie Shores apartments

Reason: This is a high EV image
Articles this image appears in: Douglas, Chicago
Creator: Joe Ravi (User:Jovianeye)

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional Oppose~~ Support if it's notable it would have references, currently the article has one sentence without any references about the apartments, if you expand it with references I'll change to support, provided you show they're notable within the context of the community. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 01:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Using that ref you should be able to add more then 1 sentence? The ref has some good info. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 03:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - How is that?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - Better, I like that it says it was designed as a self-contained enclave to protect it from the surrounding slums when it was built, it says thats why it had little impact on the south side. Also not 100% convinced the reference shows it's a highly notable feature of the community? — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 14:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        Considering your objection to all buildings having articles, this is probably a correct inclusion of encyclopedic content. It is not notable enough to have its own article, but if you ask anyone from the neighborhood about the building they can point you to it. Given that it is a suitable subject in a book not just about Chicago, it is notable at some level nationally in architecture and urban planning circles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Jujutacular ^talk 13:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]