Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Devin Hester
Appearance
- Reason
- This is a high EV image.
- Articles this image appears in
- Punt returner
Return specialist
Devin Hester - Creator
- User:Bearhanded
- Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:27, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose 318 × 634 is way to small to be of value, very little EV for listed articles due to size, it's a guy catching a ball, doesn't demonstrate anything of value to Punt returner or Return specialist and is buried in Devin Hester, in which there has to be better images existing of him for that article as evidenced by whats in the infobox. — raekyT 01:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Are you going to continue to oppose without explaining why an image needs to be greater than 250px since that is all we use in most cases? I.E., all images are basically downsampled to 200-250px. WP:VPC should not require any greater resolution, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Because it may be hard for you to believe, but some people actually (a) click on images and want to see them bigger and (b) use them for more then just displaying on a website. — raekyT 04:28, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Are you going to continue to oppose without explaining why an image needs to be greater than 250px since that is all we use in most cases? I.E., all images are basically downsampled to 200-250px. WP:VPC should not require any greater resolution, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Regardless of size, it does not make me understand what a punt returner is nor how does this guy look like. --Elekhh (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose pretty much per what Elekh said. A Vpicture should be educational and make me want to click and find out more. This doesn't tell me anything. -- bydand•talk 00:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted --Jujutacular talk 18:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)