Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/BP Bridge parapets

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm opposed to this because I don't think it showcases much of anything, even the parapets. All we see here are a few feet of the side-rear of the bridge's entrance/exit, but then again it's not really gonna be be easy to take such a photo of such a winding design. Maybe if it were more aerial... --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not an obvious illustration of (one particular type of) parapet and one of many details of BP Pedestrian Bridge, therefore not enough EV. Elekhh (talk) 23:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)--[reply]
Oppose Per above. — raeky T 14:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above reasons also. It doesn't illustrate parapets clearly. If it was more aerial as IdLoveOne said. -- Jack?! 01:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Jujutacular ^talk 14:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]