In WP:BLP#Non-article space, added: "For example, it would be appropriate to begin a discussion by stating This link has serious allegations about subject; should we summarize this someplace in the article?"
In WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a directory, added: "Likewise, disambiguation pages (such as John Smith) are not intended to be complete listings of every person in the world named John Smith — just the notable ones."
In WP:TITLE#Special characters, added: "However, avoid combining diacritical marks, which are difficult to type and interfere with adjacent characters.". Changed: "Characters resembling quotes or accent marks (avoid them): The characters ʻ ʾ ʿ ᾿ ῾ ‘ ’ “ ” c, and also combining diacritical marks with a "space" character, should generally not be used in page titles. A common exception is the apostrophe ' (e.g. Anthony d'Offay), which should, however, be used sparingly (e.g. Shia instead of Shi'a)." to: "'Quotation marks (avoid them): Double ("...") and single quotation marks ('...'), as well as variations such as typographic quotation marks (“...”), typographic apostrophes (’), "low-high" quotation marks („...“), guillemets («...»), grave and acute accents or backticks (`...´) and <q> HTML tags (<q>...</q>) should be avoided in titles. Exceptions can be made when they are part of the proper title (e.g. "A" Is for Alibi) or required by orthography ("Weird Al" Yankovic)."
In the nutshell, added: "Wikipedia is not a place to promote things, is not a thought-book, a website to communicate, a free-media center, or a censored encyclopedia."
In WP:TITLE#Disambiguation, added: "This may lead to some acceptable inconsistency; for instance, the article on chickens is found at Chicken, but the article on turkeys is at Turkey (bird) to disambiguate it from the country."
In WP:TITLE#Conciseness, changed: [The goal of conciseness is to balance brevity with sufficient information to identify the topic] "in a way the average person searching for it will recognize." to: "to a person familiar with the subject area". Added: "Exceptions exist for biographical articles. For example, neither a given name nor a family name is usually omitted or abbreviated for conciseness. Thus Oprah Winfrey (not Oprah), Jean-Paul Sartre (not J. P. Sartre). See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)."
In WP:TITLE#National varieties of English, changed: "However, sometimes" to: "Very rarely," [a form that represents only minority local usage is chosen because of its greater intelligibility to English-speaking readers worldwide (e.g. Ganges rather than "Ganga").]
In WP:TITLE#Italics and other formatting, added: "adding single quotes to a page title will cause those quotes to become part of the URL, rather than affecting its appearance."
In WP:TITLE#Considering title changes, added: [Changing one controversial title to another,] "without consensus after discussion," [is strongly discouraged.] Added: [do not invent names] "or use extremely uncommon names" [as a means of compromising between opposing points of view.]
In WP:NPOV#Due and undue weight, added: [Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means that articles should not give minority views] "or aspects" [as much of, or as detailed, a description as more widely held views] "or widely supported aspects".
In WP:NOR#Synthesis of published material, added: "Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source."
In WP:TITLE#Disambiguation, added: [It is not always possible to use the exact title that may be desired for an article, as that title may have other meanings ...]. "Sometimes, this requires a change in the variety of English used; for instance, Lift is a disambiguation page with no primary topic, so we choose elevator as the name of the lifting device.
In (renamed) WP:TITLE#Using minor details to naturally disambiguate articles, added: "Special care should be taken for names translated from other languages and even more so for transliterated titles; there is often no standardized format for the English name of the subject, so minor details are often not enough to disambiguate in such cases. ¶ Certain applications of this policy are often heavily debated; in certain instances, this form of disambiguation may not be sufficient if one article is far more of a primary topic than the other. For instance, an album entitled JESUS would probably have its article located at JESUS (album), with JESUS continuing to be a redirect to Jesus. If the album or other possible uses were deemed by editors to be reasonably likely search results for "JESUS", consensus among editors would determine whether or not JESUS would be the location for the album article, a redirect to Jesus, a disambiguation page, or a redirect to the existing disambiguation page Jesus (disambiguation)."
In WP:V#Burden of evidence, added: [Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed] "and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source." Changed: "The burden of evidence" [lies with the editor who adds or restores material] to: "The burden of identifying a reliable source". Added: [any editor who later removes the material has an obligation to articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Wikipedia] "(e.g., undue emphasis on a minor point, unencyclopedic content, etc.)."
In WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, added: "(Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome in your user namespace or on the Meta-wiki. There is a Wikipedia fork at Wikinfo that encourages personal opinions in articles." Removed: "Wikipedians who wish to hold casual discussions with fellow Wikipedians can use IRC channels."
